meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Oyez

National, Government & Organizations

4.6640 Ratings

🗓️ 25 March 2025

⏱️ 48 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction to review an Environmental Protection Agency action that affects only one state or region, simply because the EPA published that action alongside actions affecting other states in a single Federal Register notice.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Your argument next in case 23, 1067, Oklahoma versus the Environmental Protection Agency,

0:07.4

Mr. Mancing, Honey.

0:09.0

Thank you, Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court.

0:12.6

EPA actions to approve or disapprove State implementation plans are the prototypical action

0:18.7

reviewed in the Regional Circuit.

0:21.1

As I believe, Mr. Stewart confirmed in the previous argument, all parties agree at this point

0:25.4

that if EPA had disapproved Oklahoma's and Utah's plans in separate Federal Register

0:30.7

notices, those would be locally applicable actions.

0:34.7

So when it comes to applicability, the only disputed question is whether the

0:38.6

disapprovals of these state plans are transformed into a single national action because EPA

0:44.1

chose to process and publish them together with the disapprovals of 19 other states.

0:49.5

But the text of the Act's venue provision directs the courts to look at the statutory authority under

0:54.9

which EPA took its action, not the form of publication. Here, Section 7410 authorizes

1:01.3

EPA to take local action, approval or disapproval of state implementation plans. EPA's position

1:07.6

that the form of publication dictates the action's applicability for venue purposes, has no basis in the text of the statute, and indeed is at war with it.

1:16.4

That leaves EPA's backup, that the Oklahoma and Utah disapproval actions must be reviewed in the D.C. Circuit because they are based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect.

1:26.2

That exception, however, only applies to actions where EPA arrives at a generic conclusion

1:32.0

that applies uniformly to all states and that forms a dispositive reason for the agency's

1:38.0

action irrespective of local factors.

1:40.8

As Justice Gorsuch's and Kavanaugh's questions earlier today indicate EPA's reading, applying that exception anytime EPA articulates a rubric or a standard and then applies it to a local circumstance would mean essentially every local EPA action is one that is based on a nationwide determination.

1:58.9

The Court should reverse the decision below and send

2:01.4

this case back to the Tenth Circuit. I welcome the Court's questions.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Oyez, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Oyez and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.