meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Gist

Off-Label Abuse

The Gist

Peach Fish Productions

Daily News, News

4.53.7K Ratings

🗓️ 15 February 2022

⏱️ 36 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Mike talks with Evan Hughes, author of Hard Sell: Crime and Punishment at an Opioid Startup, about his coverage of an out-of-control drug maker that destroyed lives and paid a price for doing so. Also, a judge, and later a jury, decide that it will take more than inaccurately linking Sarah Palin to murder to prove a defamation case. Produced by Joel Patterson and Corey Wara Email us at thegist@mikepesca.com To advertise on the show, visit: https://advertisecast.com/TheGist  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

0:05.9

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

0:11.1

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features

0:16.7

like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

0:20.9

inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at

0:26.9

Slack.com slash DHQ. The following program has language that might be offensive, depending

0:33.6

on your definition of might and offensive and your understanding of the language.

0:38.0

It's Tuesday, February 15th. From Peachfish Productions, it's the Gest, I'm Mike Pasca.

0:47.7

My favorite Harry Potter spell is judgment non-abstantou verdictou! Actually, that is not

0:55.0

a Harry Potter spell that is a legal spell or Latin for a decision in a court of law

1:00.4

judgment notwithstanding the verdict. JNOV. Non-abstantou verdictou. I love it when

1:09.7

the Latin that you guess on happens to be the real Latin. So cool. And another cool guy

1:15.9

is Judge Jed Raycoff, who issued that judgment non-abstantou verdictou in the case he was

1:23.7

overseeing, which dealt with charges brought by Sarah Palin against the New York Times.

1:29.8

To recount, the New York Times had, in 2017, run an editorial about incendiary rhetoric

1:35.1

among politicians leading to real-life violence. Palin was in that editorial because supposedly

1:40.5

her pack put out a graphic showing a target over Gabby Giffords' district because that

1:46.6

district was a seat that Sarah Pack was targeting. And then Giffords was shot. Only the

1:52.4

connection had and has been debunked Giffords would be assassin had fixated on the congresswoman

1:59.5

plan to target her years before the graphic was ever in existence. Sarah Palin really had

2:05.3

nothing to do with that horrible crime. So the New York Times, including this claim in

2:11.3

an editorial, was sloppy rash and wrong. But that doesn't mean they were malicious as

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Peach Fish Productions, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Peach Fish Productions and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.