OA87: Revenge Porn & Parol Evidence

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Law, Opinion, Politics, News, Liberal, Legal, Supremecourt, Harvard, Atheist

4.3 • 3.7K Ratings

🗓️ 18 July 2017

⏱️ 61 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

For today's show, we take a deep dive into the law of contracts, featuring the "parol evidence" rule. First, however, we answer a question from special listener Lydia S. who wants to know all about Blac Chyna, Rob Kardashian, and "revenge porn." YOU asked for it! In the main segment, Andrew and Thomas discuss what you can and can't do to dispute a written contract. Next, Garry Myers asks us about why law firms are all structured as partnerships. Again, the answer might surprise you!. Finally, we end with the answer to Thomas Take the Bar Exam Question #32 regarding 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Listen and find out if Thomas makes it back to .500! And don't forget to play along by following our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and/or our Facebook Page and quoting the Tweet or Facebook Post that announces this episode along with your guess and reason(s)! Recent Appearances: None! Have us on your show! Show Notes & Links

You can check out California's "revenge porn" law, Penal Code - PEN § 647(j)(4), by clicking here.
And this is the Los Angeles Times article detailing Kamala Harris's first successful prosecution under the law back when she was California's Attorney General.

Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Hey, I haven't seen you since Starbucks after that festival. Oh, yeah, we need to hang out with the weather's good
0:06.3	This weekend shopping Saturday Sunday meals then lunch with Oscar next weekend
0:12.2	Thursday night we've topped in a month next Friday in a most about thing another one
0:17.5	How about right now perfect Starbucks the new chocolate you want for cone for Appetito
0:24.3	You read my mind summer hits different with Starbucks subject to availability whilst stocks last
0:30.0	I
0:32.8	Refuse to testify on the grounds that my organs will be chopped up into a patty. Oh the 67th amendment
0:49.6	I move for a bad court thingy you mean a mistrone. Yeah, that's why you're the judge and I'm the law talking guy
1:01.0	Can you see
1:03.0	Anywhere in this
1:25.0	Welcome to opening arguments the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer
1:30.0	This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P. Antritoris LLC for entertainment purposes is not intended as legal advice
1:36.9	It does not form an attorney-client relationship. Don't take legal advice from a podcast
1:48.6	Hello and welcome to opening arguments. This is episode number 87
1:52.8	I'm your host Thomas Smith that over there is your more important host Andrew Torres. How you doing Andrew?
1:56.9	I dispute the premise of the question, but I'm doing great. How are you doing great?
2:01.1	We are recording as we always do ahead of time for this episode, but by the time you're hearing this
2:05.8	I'm sure we all had a great time at
2:08.3	Insighting incident hundredth episode. So I hope you guys were there and we met anyway
2:13.8	We've got a very important pre show announcement here for you. Do you want to start that Andrew? I?
2:19.4	Love this idea
2:22.0	So as you know our patrons inflicted upon us the very worst movie ever made the very worst movie that it is possible
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.