4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 23 February 2023
⏱️ 56 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Today, Liz and Andrew visit the strange world of James O'Keefe and his agitprop outfit, Project Veritas. Along the way we'll learn about a bunch of cases, the law of prior restraint, and much, much more!
Notes
Project Veritas $22 million
https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/272894856
Federal Docket O'Keefe v. Twitter
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59899639/okeefe-iii-v-twitter-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
NY Appellate docs - O’Keefe v. Twitter
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=OihBJQsmc7aFb4qIIdOKeA==
Liz ATL on O’Keefe-CNN
https://abovethelaw.com/2021/04/project-veritas-gonna-sue-twitter-for-defamatory-section-230-censorship-and-first-amendment-assault-or-something/
Project Veritas Docket (00813)
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/61377333/parties/in-re-search-warrant-dated-november-5-2021/
Project Veritas Board of Directors
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/statement-from-the-project-veritas-board-of-directors/
-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at [email protected]!
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | I'll have you know the contents of that dumpster are private you stick your nose in you'll be violating attorney dumpster confidentiality |
0:11.0 | I just want to say hello |
0:13.0 | Oh, hello |
0:19.0 | All right we're done |
0:21.0 | You think the language in the second amendment is clear enough you know about the right to bear arms? |
0:25.0 | Of course it's clear every American has the right to hang a pair of bear arms on their wall how could that possibly be misconstrued? |
0:31.0 | All right fantastic then wait you know what before we send this to the printer let's take that abortion thing up |
0:39.0 | Oh come on I move for a hearing on the matter |
0:41.0 | What you want me to have a special motion on the admissibility of the word asshole? |
0:45.0 | Well let me have asked them that's close enough |
0:48.0 | What law school did you go to? I'll agree to it your honor you will why? |
0:51.0 | I don't want any interlocutor appeals what are you a comedy team? |
0:56.0 | Welcome to opening arguments the podcast that breaks down the law behind all the news stories you care about |
1:03.0 | This podcast is sponsored by the law offices P and Rituras LLC |
1:07.0 | Burner Tamey Purposes is not intended as legal advice it does not form a attorney client relationship |
1:14.0 | Don't take legal advice from a podcast |
1:21.0 | Hey everybody I'm Liz Dye and with me is Andrew Torres and this is opening arguments episode 696 |
1:27.0 | Hey Liz how are you doing? Good in you? |
1:30.0 | I am great I am excited about this episode I'm looking at breaking news that Jack Smith's one sixth grand jury has now subpoenaed Jared and Ivanka |
1:41.0 | So that is just coming across as we record this more when we know |
1:46.0 | But today we're actually going to talk about how a truly terrible person has run headlong into some super interesting first-of-the-mill law |
1:56.0 | So it's you know it's breaking and and it's also a classic OA deep dive |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.