OA42: Denny Hastert and the Limits of Contract Law
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 10 February 2017
⏱️ 62 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Today's episode is brought  to you by Audible! Go to audible.com/lawpod for your free 30 day trial!!
In today's episode, we take a look at the law of contracts, and particularly in the context of the recent lawsuit involving former Speaker of the House Denny Hastert. We begin, however, with a related question from patron Michael, who asks whether the Scientologists can really enforce that billion-year contract to join to Sea Org.  (This answer will not surprise you.) That leads into our main segment, where we look at the strange and tragic lawsuit being brought against Hastert by a victim of his past sexual assault.  Hastert agreed to pay the victim $3.5 million for his silence, and then stopped paying after he came under federal investigation.  Recently, Hastert counter-sued to recover the hush money previously paid, and we break down all the intricacies of contract law to try and figure out who's likely to get what. After our main segment, we tackle another listener question; this time, about whether employers can fire you for smoking marijuana in the privacy of your own home if you live in a state like Colorado that's legalized marijuana use. Finally, we end with a brand new Thomas Takes the Bar Exam question #10 which is another very, very hard question.  Remember that TTTBE issues a new question every Friday, followed by the answer on next Tuesday's show.  Don't forget to play along by following our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and/or our Facebook Page and quoting the Tweet or Facebook Post that announces this episode along with your guess and reason(s)! Show Notes & Links- This Chicago Tribune article sets forth the facts of the Hastert case.
- And this Tribune article contains the actual text of Haster's counterclaim that we discuss during the show.
- On Thursday, Andrew was a guest on The Scathing Atheist podcast episode #208.
- That same day (he's a busy guy!), Andrew also did a guest spot on episode #103 of the Gaytheist Manifesto podcast.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | But it's a great change, it should be thrilled. |
| 0:04.8 | Well, there could be a death penalty. |
| 0:06.3 | Nothing to lawyer. |
| 0:19.8 | Seriously, when the goaling gets tough, |
| 0:21.7 | you don't want a criminal lawyer. |
| 0:23.4 | All right, you want a criminal lawyer. |
| 0:31.0 | Lady Trond, they're in jet-a-box. |
| 0:33.5 | Objection, in the absence of pants, |
| 0:35.9 | defense and suspenders serve no purpose. |
| 0:38.3 | I'm going to allow them. |
| 0:40.1 | For now, thank you. |
| 0:45.2 | I'm going to be a simple country, have a chicken. |
| 0:48.1 | But I know when we're a finger-lift, |
| 0:50.2 | what do you say we plead insanity? |
| 0:55.0 | Welcome to Opening Arguments, the podcast that |
| 0:57.2 | pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer. |
| 1:00.1 | This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P. |
| 1:02.6 | Andrew Torres, LLC for Entertainment Purpose's, |
| 1:05.4 | is not intended as legal advice, |
| 1:07.0 | and does not form an attorney-client relationship. |
| 1:09.5 | Don't take legal advice from a podcast. |
| 1:17.6 | Hello, and welcome to Opening Arguments. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

