OA392: In the Aftermath of George Floyd
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 5 June 2020
⏱️ 82 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Today's extra-long show -- two hours if you're a patron! -- tackles all the issues surrounding the state of our Union in the aftermath of the George Floyd murder, including questions about which charges should be filed against Derek Chauvin, whether Trump can invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807, and much, much more! Oh, and as a bonus, we also have a "lightning round" Yodel Mountain segment (with deep dives for patrons).
We begin with an in-depth discussion of an argument made by arguably the country's greatest legal mind, Laurence Tribe, that the murder-3 charge against George Floyd was sure to be dismissed. Find out why Andrew thinks Tribe is wrong, even in light of the Minnesota DA's decision to add a murder-2 charge to Chauvin's charges. After that, Andrew will explain one thing he was wrong about... due to a "quirk" in Minnesota's laws regarding felony murder and the merger doctrine.
Then, we discuss Trump's invocation of the Insurrection Act of 1807 to justify potentially sending armed forces into American cities. You'll learn exactly how not justified this is... and whether it matters.
After that, it's time to (briefly!) check in with Black Lives Matter and evaluate their lawsuit against Eric Garcetti for an injunction to block the Los Angeles curfew. Will it succeed? (No.)
We're not remotely done, though! After all that, it's time to head on up for a lightning round atop Yodel Mountain., were we check in on (1) Rod Rosenstein's Senate testimony, (2) Judge Sullivan's DC Circuit brief in the Flynn case, and (3) a weird story making the rounds regarding a 2016 lawsuit filed (and dropped) against Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.
After all that, it’s time for an all-new #T3BE involving character testimony. It's a tough question; can Thomas get it right? Listen and find out!
And remember -- if you're a patron, you get a ton of bonus content in this episode, including deep dives on each and every one of these stories!
Patreon Bonuses
There's a new Patreon amicus thread in addition to all the other patreon goodies.
Appearances
None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, event, or in front of your group (virtually!), please drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.
Show Notes & Links
- COVID-19 is still a crisis.
- On Floyd: (a) you can click here to read the revised Chauvin charging document; (b) this is the here's the Laurence Tribe article; and (c) here's the Greg Egan law review article. We also discuss a number of cases including State v. Wahlberg, 296 N.W. 2d 408 (Minn. 1980), State v. Loebach, 310 N.W. 2d 58 (Minn. 1981), and State v. Barnes, 713 N.W.2d 325 (Minn. 2006).
- On the Insurrection Act of 1807, 10 U.S.C. §§ 251-255, we cited two specific provisions: § 252 and § 253. And we discussed Greg Gianforte back in Episode 72. During the bonus, we also discussed two executive orders from the George H. W. Bush presidency: EO 12690 and EO 12804, and two corresponding Proclamations: 6023 and 6427.
- During the bonus, we also break down how Vol. I of the Mueller Report contradicts Rosenstein's testimony.
- Finally, check out Sullivan's D.C. Circuit brief.
-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-Remember to check out our YouTube Channel for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!
-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | He's not even a lawyer and he's kicking your ass. |
| 0:19.0 | No! Bad lawyer! I need a loophole! |
| 0:25.0 | He's not Judge Judy on executioner! He is! |
| 0:31.0 | I'm sorry, but my mother always said if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all. |
| 0:38.0 | Will that hold up in court? No, I've tried it before. |
| 0:45.0 | Stop. Ask a question a lawyer would ask, please. I am a lawyer. |
| 0:55.0 | Welcome to Opening Arguments, a podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer. |
| 1:00.0 | This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P. Andrew Torres, LLC for Entertainment Procoses, |
| 1:05.0 | is not intended as legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship. |
| 1:09.0 | Don't take legal advice from a podcast. |
| 1:18.0 | Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments. This is episode 392. I'm Thomas, that's Andrew. How you doing, Andrew? |
| 1:24.0 | I have to say fantastic, right? |
| 1:27.0 | You are contractually obligated. |
| 1:30.0 | I'm excited to do the show, I'm not excited that the world is still on fire, but I am excited to do the show. |
| 1:36.0 | We can do a little contract law. You are obligated to say Vandesik, but at what point has the world become such an act of God or whatever? |
| 1:46.0 | Just state of things? What point can you no longer be held to that? |
| 1:51.0 | Force-major clause. |
| 1:53.0 | That's right. I don't have to be fantastic. |
| 1:57.0 | I think you just start your honor and then just gestures about the world. Just look at everything and then be like, the case dismissed. |
| 2:05.0 | Our listeners know that I and the firm have been hard at work on our Amicus brief in the Michael Flynn case. |
| 2:19.0 | I will tell you Morgan and I have had to edit out like stage directions from the Amicus brief on multiple occasions. |
| 2:29.0 | I think it's just that there's so much where you're just kind of like, look around. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

