meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA39: Trump's Muslim Ban

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Law, Opinion, Politics, News, Liberal, Legal, Supremecourt, Harvard, Atheist

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 31 January 2017

⏱️ 81 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's episode revisits a question we tackled way back in Episode #16, namely, whether President Trump has the authority to enact his Muslim Ban. We begin with an examination of the recent CREW lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that President Trump has violated the Emoluments Clause.  Is that lawsuit likely to prevail?  What could it accomplish?  Listen and find out. In the main segment, we consider not only the recent Trump Executive Order restricting the entry of aliens from seven majority-Muslim nations (the "Muslim Ban").  We address questions of legality and constitutionality, as well as break down the recent injunction handed down by the Southern District of New York in response to the ACLU's lawsuit. After our main segment, we turn to a question from a conservative listener about abortion and whether Roe v. Wade was an "activist" decision. Finally, we end with the answer to Thomas Takes the Bar Exam question #8 about a landowner's duties regarding trespassers who accidentally fall into the landowner's murder lake.  Remember that TTTBE issues a new question every Friday, followed by the answer on next Tuesday's show.  Don't forget to play along by following our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and/or our Facebook Page and quoting the Tweet or Facebook Post that announces this episode along with your guess and reason(s)! Show Notes & Links
  1. The CREW lawsuit is here.
  2. We reference two decisions on the "political question" doctrine:  Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) and Nixon v. U.S., 506 U.S. 224 (1993).
  3. We initially discussed the Muslim Ban way back in OA Episode #16, which is worth another listen!
  4. The authorizing statute (the "1952 Law") is 8 USC §1182(f).
  5. The "1965  Law" is 8 USC §1152(a).
  6. In light of those two provisions, we think you can spot the errors in David Bier's op-ed in the New York Times.
  7. I wrote a lot on Facebook about the ACLU lawsuit and the injunction handed down by the court on Saturday, so you can check that out if you want the relevant documents.
Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

It's a great change of his feelings.

0:04.8

Well, there could be a death penalty.

0:06.3

Nothing to lawyer.

0:19.8

Seriously, when the going gets tough, you don't want to criminal lawyer.

0:23.2

All right, you want a criminal lawyer.

0:31.0

Lady Trahan's air injector box.

0:33.4

Objection.

0:34.4

In the absence of pants, defense and suspenders serve no purpose.

0:38.0

I'm going to allow them.

0:40.0

For now, thank you.

0:45.0

I'm going to be a simple country, have a chicken.

0:48.0

But I know when we're a finger-lift, what do you say we plead in sanity?

0:55.0

Welcome to Opening Arguments, the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer.

0:59.8

This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P. Andrew Torres, LLC for entertainment purposes,

1:04.8

is not intended as legal advice, and does not form an attorney-client relationship.

1:08.8

Don't take legal advice from a podcast.

1:16.8

Hello, and welcome to Opening Arguments.

1:19.8

This is episode number 39.

1:21.8

I'm your host, number B. Thomas Smith.

1:25.8

That over there is host A. Andrew Torres.

1:29.8

Hey, Thomas, how are you doing?

1:31.8

I'm doing great.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.