meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA365: Every Melody Ever, Part 1

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Atheist, Law, Politics, News, Harvard, Supremecourt, Legal, Opinion, Liberal

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 3 March 2020

⏱️ 81 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's episode brings you our first look at the efforts by Damien Riehl and Noah Rubin to copyright "every melody ever" as part of a way of reconceptualizing copyright law as it applies to music. SPOILER: We're going to have Riehl and Rubin on the show to discuss their work in more depth. We also discuss Chevron deference and a recent dissent by Clarence Thomas that's No Laughing Matter.

We begin with a deep dive into the Riehl and Rubin "Every Melody Ever" effort, which builds upon the music copyright episodes we've previously discussed in Episode 236 ("Stairway to the Supreme Court") and Episode 288 ("More on Led Zeppelin"). What exactly are Riehl and Rubin doing, and will it put an end to copyright lawsuits against musicians? Listen and find out!

After that, we check out a case (Baldwin v. U.S.) in which the Supreme Court refused to grant certiorari -- and the dissent filed by Clarence Thomas. That prompted a headline that got some chuckles last week -- "Clarence Thomas cites Thomas in overruling Thomas" -- and we learn that (of course) this turns out to be no laughing matter, but part of a concerted effort to roll back not only a 2005 Clarence Thomas opinion, National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Svcs., 545 U.S. 967 (2005), but Chevron deference itself. Find out why even the howler monkey contingent wanted to take a pass on this case -- but not Clarence Thomas!

After all that, it's time for the answer to perhaps the easiest #T3BE ever -- or is it? (It is.) And remember, you can always play along with #T3BE by sharing out the show on social media!

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. Our basics on music and copyright were covered in Episode 236 and then with a follow-up in Episode 288.
  2. For (some of) the details on Riehl and Rubin's project, you can read the write-up in Vice.
  3. Finally, you can check out Thomas's cert dissent in Baldwin v. U.S. here.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-Remember to check out our YouTube Channel  for Opening Arguments: The Briefs and other specials!

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

What kind of law do you practice?

0:04.0

Law, law, practice.

0:08.0

Maritime, maritime law.

0:11.0

Now what grounds could you possibly prevent?

0:22.0

Brown suitcases about grounds.

0:24.0

This always come down to who the jury likes better.

0:31.0

Mr. Ferley, I've sworn you that if you were jammed from Bannerag or bulldozers,

0:35.0

it's really hard to think we're in Dimbeur.

0:37.0

You're not your kid most pretty.

0:39.0

Very well, then you guys are pretty.

0:45.0

A cash settlement.

0:47.0

I could have figured that out, you butted down maggot!

0:49.0

You have any cream?

0:50.0

No, he is of course.

0:51.0

Where are my men?

0:52.0

Welcome to opening arguments.

0:56.0

The podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with the real-life lawyer.

1:00.0

This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P.A.

1:03.0

LLC for entertainment purposes.

1:05.0

It's not intended as legal advice,

1:07.0

it does not form an attorney-client relationship.

1:09.0

Don't take legal advice from a podcast.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.