OA310: Citizenship and the Military and...
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 30 August 2019
⏱️ 84 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Today's Rapid Response Friday takes a look at the recent Trump Administration memorandum "clarifying" the rules on military citizenship for children born to U.S. employees -- largely, those in the armed forces -- serving overseas. Is it as bad as you've heard? (Yes.) Is it actually worse than that? (Yes.)
First, though, we continue to revisit the apportionment question discussed in Episode 307. Have we finally crowdsourced a solution? The answer may surprise you!
After that, it's time for a deep dive into the latest policy manual update from the department of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services "clarifying" that servicemembers living overseas don't actually count as "living in the United States." Will this cause Trump-supporting military members to vote for Elizabeth Warren in 2020? (No.) Should it? (Yes.) Is it way, way worse than you could possibly imagine? Oh yes.
After that, it's time for a very brief Andrew Was Wrong (the best kind!).
Then, it's time for an all-new Thomas Takes the Bar Exam, in which we have... something approaching "Don't Take Legal Advice From A Podcast" Law? You won't want to miss this question involving a disgruntled landlord and a put-upon law student. Can Thomas break his losing streak? Listen and find out!
Appearances
None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.
Show Notes & Links
- We first covered the potential apportionment crisis in Episode 307.
- You can read the latest policy manual update from the department of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for yourself.
- The relevant legal provisions of the Immigration and Naturalization Act are 8 U.S.C. § 1401, 8 U.S.C § 1431, and 8 U.S.C. § 1433.
- This is the August 15th, 2019 story about how the Trump administration continues to use the "out-of-wedlock" rule against LGBTQ couples.
- Finally, this is the garbage, racist National Review article on birthright citizenship, and this is U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S> 649 (1898).
-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!
-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The jury is like, oh snap, the twists, like they love twists, integrate trial as a twist. |
| 0:10.0 | I suggest that we give them 10 years in 11 ways or 11 years in 12 ways. |
| 0:23.0 | I'll tell you what I'll do, I'll take 5 and 10 in one way. |
| 0:28.0 | Well it was like this Mr. Codd, address the judge as your honor. |
| 0:35.0 | Well it was like this my honor, your honor not my honor. |
| 0:39.0 | Why, don't you like him? |
| 0:45.0 | You all meant to come down here and defend me against these characters. |
| 0:48.0 | And the only one I've got on my side is the bloodside, the King Lawyer. |
| 0:53.0 | Welcome to opening arguments, the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with the real-life lawyer. |
| 0:59.0 | This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P.A. |
| 1:03.0 | Tori's LLC for Entertainment Purposes, is not intended as legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship. |
| 1:09.0 | Don't take legal advice from a podcast. |
| 1:13.0 | Hello and welcome to opening arguments, this is episode 310. |
| 1:22.0 | I'm your host Thomas Smith out over there as Andrew Torres, how you doing Andrew? |
| 1:25.0 | I am fantastic Thomas, how are you? |
| 1:27.0 | I am doing great, we got so much to talk about. |
| 1:30.0 | Big news, there is so much to cover, we are surely not going to do, be able to accomplish it, |
| 1:38.0 | but some announcements first, probably mostly related to what we can't do. |
| 1:42.0 | I don't have time to do. |
| 1:44.0 | So I have a note here that we are doing opioids on Tuesday, so I guess the news cycle has gotten that depressing that we are just out with it. |
| 1:50.0 | You and I are going to sit in a room and take as much oxy as we are going to discuss the landmark opioid trial. |
| 2:01.0 | I am doing opioids. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

