OA297: Twitter, Emoluments & Labor Unions
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 16 July 2019
⏱️ 73 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Today's episode features a grab-bag of stories that have been making the rounds, including the recent ruling out of the Second Circuit regarding Donald Trump's use of Twitter, a setback for our buddy Brian Frosh's efforts to enforce the Emoluments Clauses of the Constitution, and an update on the real-word consequences of the Janus v. AFSCME decision we decry so much around here.
We begin with the Second Circuit's ruling in Knight First Amendment Inst. v. Trump, which established that a government official may convert a social media platform such as Twitter into a "limited use public forum," from which he may not block users on the basis of the political content of their speech -- i.e., viewpoint discrimination. Almost no one understands this decision; we'll make sure you're one of the lucky ones who do!
Then, it's time for a breakdown of the 4th Circuit's ruling in In re Trump, which directs the lower court to dismiss the lawsuit (and pending discovery) against Trump in the lawsuit brought by Maryland and D.C. alleging violations of the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments Clauses. Find out what this case is all about, whether the outcome is reasonable, and what's next.
After that, it's time for a quick look at the real-world implications of the Janus v. AFSCME decision allowing public-sector union employees to withhold a portion of their dues otherwise allocated for administrative duties under... some crazy right-wing theory that something something something, because Sam Alito knows diminishing the power of unions will hurt Democrats. But what else did that decision do? Listen and find out!
After all that, it's time for the most controversial #TTTBE yet, in which we discover the answer to Thomas Takes The Bar Exam (regarding larceny and robbery) ... or do we? You won't want to miss this one!
Appearances
Andrew was a guest on the latest episode of the Left at the Valley podcast discussing abortion, as well as the most recent episode of Mueller, She Wrote talking.. well, pretty much everything!
Show Notes & Links
- Click here to read the Second Circuit's ruling in Knight First Amendment Inst. v. Trump (the Twitter case), and here to check out the Fourth Circuit's ruling in In Re Trump (the Emoluments case).
- We first covered the emoluments case way back in Episode 78, and we interviewed Seth Barrett Tillman for his unique take in Episode 35 and Episode 36.
- We learned that bad stuff was coming in the emoluments litigation in Episode 239 when the 4th Circuit issued a stay of all discovery; you can read that stay order here.
- Finally, click here to read the LA Progressive article on Mark Janus and his conservative activism.
-Support
us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
-Follow us
on Twitter: @Openargs
-Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and
don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!
-For
show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which
now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki
-And
finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | So I hold myself in contempt if you try to pull me up here to court without attorney. |
| 0:10.0 | I'll ask the questions here, Carjack Owily, objection! |
| 0:23.0 | I'm going to allow it at correct charges that offended as a carjacker. |
| 0:28.0 | You didn't kill Thompson, but you did Mr. Wells? |
| 0:33.0 | Yes! Yes, I killed that Thompson! I killed it! I killed it! I killed it! |
| 0:45.0 | You're out of order! You're out of order! The whole trial is out of order! Get out of order! |
| 0:53.0 | Welcome to Opening Arguments, the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with the real-life lawyer. |
| 0:59.0 | This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P. Andrew Torres, LLC for Entertainment Purposes, |
| 1:05.0 | is not intended as legal advice, and does not form an attorney-client relationship. |
| 1:09.0 | Don't take legal advice from a podcast. |
| 1:15.0 | Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments of this episode 297. |
| 1:21.0 | I'm Thomas Smith out over there as P. Andrew Torres. How are you doing, Andrew? |
| 1:25.0 | I am fantastic. Still very, very excited about our live show in New York. |
| 1:31.0 | Me too. |
| 1:32.0 | Keep that weekend clear, folks. You're going to want to come. You're not going to want to miss it. |
| 1:36.0 | I had the brilliant idea, and I'm going to plug it right now just for fun. |
| 1:40.0 | We're going to make sure there's at least one nice, lengthy, fun, meaty segment during that live show |
| 1:46.0 | that only happens there, and maybe for our patrons, but does not go out to the main show. |
| 1:51.0 | If people are going to come to the live show, they should get something that nobody else is getting, |
| 1:56.0 | except our patrons. Patrons get everything because they're our patrons. |
| 1:59.0 | We can't leave them out of the equation. That's just how patronage works. |
| 2:03.0 | But we're going to have bonus stuff that only people there and patrons are going to hear. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

