OA29: Cognitive Dissonance
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 21 December 2016
⏱️ 66 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
It's a two-episode week! In this week's Wednesday episode, we are joined by Tom & Cecil of the Cognitive Dissonance podcast for a discussion about freedom of speech and whether online platforms such as Facebook and Twitter ought to be considered "public spaces."
We begin with some announcements about the schedule, including Thomas Takes the Bar Exam, which will remain a weekly feature once we move to our twice-per-week format in January. So no new question today, but you will have a few extra days to answer TTTBE #3.
Then we take a look at the new Texas law requiring funereal services for aborted embryos and miscarriages, and Thomas takes a shot at analyzing the issue. Is all his hard work studying for the Bar Exam paying off? Listen and find out!
Finally, the show concludes with a discussion of the 1994 McDonalds "Hot Coffee" lawsuit, Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, as an example of legal myths gone awry. What exactly happened in that case, and what does it say about whether we should have caps on punitive damages or other forms of "tort reform" in the U.S.?
After that, we look at the abortion-related question of the lawsuit ostensibly brought by Sofia Vergara's frozen embryos. Is this a meritorious lawsuit or a publicity stunt orchestrated by a goofball anti-abortion columnist?
Show Notes & Links
- Check out the Cognitive Dissonance podcast!
- Here are the actual fetal tissue rules promulgated by the Texas Health Services that require "interment" of "the products of spontaneous or induced human abortion."
- A federal judge in the Western District of Texas recently issued a temporary restraining order blocking the implementation of the rules pending a preliminary injunction hearing to be held on January 3.
- Whole Women's Health v. Hellerstedt, 136 S.Ct. 2292 (2016), provides some guidance as to how the Supreme Court might treat the Texas abortion rules.
- Here's the CollegeHumor video on the McDonald's "Hot Coffee" lawsuit.
Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | It's a great change of his feelings. |
| 0:04.8 | Well, there could be a death penalty. |
| 0:06.3 | Nothing to lawyer. |
| 0:19.8 | Seriously, when the going gets tough, you don't want to criminal lawyer. |
| 0:23.2 | All right, you want a criminal lawyer. |
| 0:31.0 | Lady Trahan's air injector box. |
| 0:33.4 | Objection. |
| 0:34.4 | In the absence of pants, defense and suspenders serve no purpose. |
| 0:38.2 | I'm going to allow them. |
| 0:40.0 | For now, thank you. |
| 0:45.0 | I'm going to be a simple country, have a chicken. |
| 0:48.0 | But I know when we're a finger-lift, what do you say we plead insanity? |
| 0:55.0 | Welcome to Opening Arguments, the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer. |
| 0:59.8 | This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P. Andrew Torres, LLC for entertainment purposes, |
| 1:04.8 | is not intended as legal advice, and does not form an attorney-client relationship. |
| 1:08.8 | Don't take legal advice from a podcast. |
| 1:17.8 | Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments. |
| 1:20.8 | This is episode 29 coming at you for a second time this week. |
| 1:24.8 | How exciting is that? |
| 1:25.8 | How you doing, Andrew? |
| 1:26.8 | I'm great. |
| 1:27.8 | Thomas, how are you? |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

