meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA289: #OpposeJustinWalker

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Law, Opinion, Politics, News, Liberal, Legal, Supremecourt, Harvard, Atheist

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 21 June 2019

⏱️ 86 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's episode -- #OpposeJustinWalker -- tells you everything you need to know about Donald Trump's latest nominee for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench (and Andrew's former debate opponent) Justin Walker. You already know he's a lifelong member of the Federalist Society. Why is it specifically worth opposing him? Listen and find out!

First, though, the guys break down the Supreme Court's 7-2 ruling in U.S. v. Gamble, affirming the "dual sovereignty" doctrine and finally putting the last nail in the coffin of a crazy lefty conspiracy theory we debunked way back in Episode 215. And, as a bonus (?), we find out why Clarence Thomas's concurrence is "the most horrifying thing in print in the past 50 years." Seriously!

After that breakdown, it's time to analyze the background and writings of Justin Walker. We learn that he has virtually no litigation experience and that he's a right-wing ideologue; you probably expected that. But you'll also learn that his two major contributions to academic jurisprudence are (1) arguing that transparency in government is a bad, possibly unconstitutional thing; and (2) arguing that the FBI Director has a moral obligation to be the President's lackey. We are not making any of this up.

Then, it's time for Thomas Takes The Bar Exam and a question on the propriety of a introducing a particular fact into evidence as the predicate for a cross-examination question. Is it hearsay? Is it impeachment? Is it just hunky-dory? Listen and find out!

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

1. We discussed the American Legion v. AHA Bladensburg cross case in OA Episodes 256 (with Sarah Henry of the AHA) and Episode 274 with Monica Miller. Monica IS coming back on the show!
2. Click here to read Gamble v. U.S. which we first discussed in OA 215.
3. Andrew debated Justin Walker in Episode 224.
4. This is his announcement.
5. You can read Walker’s CV here.
6. Of Justin Walker’s law review articles, click here to read “Chilled Chambers" and here to read “FBI Independence as a Threat to Civil Liberties: An Analogy to Civilian Control of the Military”.
7. By the way, this is the link to the FBI investigating Deutsche Bank in connection with Jared Kushner.
8. Finally, this is Walker’s National Review article.

-Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don't forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Will interest rates change again?

0:02.0

What's new where I live?

0:04.0

Whatever the question, Google helps people in the UK access reliable news on a wide range of stories.

0:11.0

Learn more at g.co.slashsupportingnews.us

0:18.0

So I hold myself in contempt if you try to pull me up here to court with that attorney.

0:30.0

I'll ask the questions here. Car Jacka Willey. Objection!

0:38.0

I'm going to allow it at characterizes the defenders of Car Jacka.

0:45.0

You didn't kill Thompson, but you did Mr. Wells?

0:48.0

Yes! Yes, I killed that Thompson! I killed it! I killed it! I killed it! I killed it!

1:01.0

You're out of order! You're out of order! The whole trial is out of order! Get out of order!

1:10.0

Welcome to Opening Arguments, a podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer.

1:15.0

This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P. Antitora's LLC for entertainment purposes

1:20.0

is not intended as legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship.

1:24.0

Don't take legal advice from a podcast.

1:31.0

Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments. This is episode 289.

1:37.0

I'm Thomas Smith out over there as Andrew Torres. How you doing, Andrew?

1:42.0

I see. Well, I am fantastic.

1:45.0

Smoke coming out of your ears.

1:48.0

Yep. Yeah. Quite a lot of breaking news this week.

1:55.0

I believe that we have unique insight into the latest Trump nominee to the federal judiciary.

2:04.0

There's a lifetime appointment to the federal bench, to the US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky.

2:11.0

I am excited to tell people about that. Even if I am not excited about why I'm telling people about that.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.