meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA259: Your Guide to the Congressional Investigations

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Law, Opinion, Politics, News, Liberal, Legal, Supremecourt, Harvard, Atheist

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 8 March 2019

⏱️ 84 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's extra-long episode contains your guide to the Congressional Investigations, and specifically the 81 document requests sent out by Rep. Jerry Nadler to various Trump-related individuals and entities in connection with the Democratic Congress's larger investigation into corruption, ties with Russia, and general criminal behavior by the administration.  What does it all mean?  Who are the key players?  Listen and find out!

We begin, however, with a brief Andrew Was Right -- Michael Cohen is producing drafts of his Congressional testimony, which may support his claim that Trump's personal lawyer, Jay "ACLJ" Sekulow edited his testimony to suborn perjury.

Then, it's time for an in-depth look at the various documents requested by Rep. Nadler.  What does it all mean?  We break down the four major "buckets" of inquiries and tell you about some familiar faces... and some surprising new ones.

After that, it's time to take a look into recent developments in the Jeffrey Epstein case and correct some reporting as to whether his non-prosecution agreement has really been torn up by the courts.  (It hasn't.)

We end, as always, with a brand new Thomas Takes the Bar Exam Question #117 about the use of university space for a debate on affirmative action.  As always, remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE!

Appearances
Andrew was just a guest host on Episode 91 of the Skepticrat; go check it out!  And if you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

1. Cohen to produce drafts of his testimony to Congress.
2. Congressional Investigations 162 documents served on 81 different people. Documents here:
3. Here’s a handy guide to who’s who in the investigation.
4. Here’s Hope Hicks’s documents request.
5. Here’s our tweet out to Rep. Nadler regarding Nader’s document requests:
6. Epstein. This is the text of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. § 3771.
7. Judge Marra’s ruling can be found here.

Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law

Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!

For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

We find a defendant incredibly guilty.

0:19.8

I found his ultimate chicken sandwich on Brio's bon-to-be guilty of being delicious.

0:31.0

What section of the Constitution has been breached?

0:34.0

There is no one section.

0:37.0

It's just the vibe of the thing.

0:45.0

Objection, Your Honor.

0:46.0

What?

0:47.0

He's leading the witness.

0:48.0

To save.

0:49.0

And break our boat's lawyers.

0:55.0

Welcome to Opening Arguments,

0:56.0

the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer.

0:59.0

This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P. Andrew Torres,

1:03.0

LLC for Entertainment purposes, is not intended as legal advice,

1:06.0

and does not form an attorney-client relationship.

1:09.0

Don't take legal advice from a podcast.

1:17.0

Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments, Episode 259.

1:21.0

How's it going, Andrew Torres?

1:24.0

It is going fantastically well, Tom Smith. How are you?

1:27.0

Doing well.

1:28.0

I think the fans will be delighted to hear your deeper, congested, sexy lawyer voice.

1:34.0

It's always...

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.