meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA251: Gerrymandering in Maryland Heads Back to SCOTUS

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Law, Opinion, Politics, News, Liberal, Legal, Supremecourt, Harvard, Atheist

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 8 February 2019

⏱️ 83 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's episode returns to one of the most critical political issues of our time:  gerrymandering of congressional districts, and in particular, the state of MD-6, which pits the Democrats as villains and Republican voters as the plaintiffs alleging disenfranchisement.  Will that role reversal be enough to win approval from SCOTUS?  Listen and find out!

We begin, however, with an update on the June Medical Services v. Gee lawsuit we first discussed in Episode 249.

After that, it's time for the deep dive into gerrymandering, which takes a look at the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland's 3-judge panel decision invalidating Maryland's 6th district; the motion to stay before the Supreme Court filed by the Plaintiffs; the opposition by the State of Maryland; and an amicus brief filed on behalf of the incumbent, Democrat David Trone.

Then, we quickly clear up the status of Stormy Daniels' lawsuits.  Did the recent dismissal with prejudice have anything to do with Donald Trump?  (No.)

We end, as always, with a brand new Thomas Takes the Bar Exam Question #113 that's coincidentally about the constitutionality of abortion restrictions.  As always, remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE!

Appearances

None!  If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

1. Episode OA: 249 "Overturning Roe v. Wade Starts Today" for reference to our past discussion on the abortion cases. 
2. Supreme Court’s docket in June Medical Services v. Gee
3. If you’re curious, this is what MD-6 looks like today, and this is what it looked like before the 2011 redistricting.
4. We last discussed gerrymandering in Episode OA: 185
5. We also did a deep dive into the Wisconsin case in Episode OA: 80
6. Here is the Maryland district court’s ruling court’s ruling
7. You can read the Plaintiffs’ brief
8. The state's opposition, filed by Brian Frosh
9. And the Trone amicus brief filed by Andrew’s friends at Zuckerman

Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law

Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!

For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Google connects millions of people in the UK to publications of all sizes,

0:04.3

from national papers to local press,

0:06.4

part of our commitment to supporting a strong and varied UK news industry.

0:11.0

Learn more at g.co-sla-supportingnews-us.uk

0:18.9

We find the defendants incredibly guilty.

0:30.0

How fun is ultimate chicken sandwich on brio's bon-tubee guilty of being delicious?

0:46.6

What section of the constitution has been breached?

0:49.9

There is no one section, it's just the vibe of the thing.

1:00.6

Objection, Your Honor. What?

1:02.4

Is leading the witness.

1:03.5

To save.

1:04.3

You break our boat's lawyers.

1:10.2

Welcome to opening arguments.

1:11.6

The podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer.

1:15.2

This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P.

1:17.8

Antitoura's LLC for entertainment purposes.

1:20.5

It's not intended as legal advice,

1:22.0

and does not form an attorney-client relationship.

1:24.7

Don't take legal advice from a podcast.

1:30.2

Hello and welcome to opening arguments.

1:35.1

This is episode 251.

1:37.2

Oh, future Andrew and Thomas, how good was that intro?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.