OA223: A Victory for Voting Rights in Pennsylvania!
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 2 November 2018
⏱️ 79 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Today's Rapid Response Friday revisits some cases we've previously discussed with recent positive developments: the Summer Zervos lawsuit and the future of political gerrymandering in Pennsylvania.
We begin with the Zervos lawsuit we first covered in Episode 176, in which a state trial court judge has ordered Donald Trump to respond to discovery served by Zervos's attorney. What's next for the President and why does it have Yodel Mountain implications? You'll have to listen and find out!
After that, we revisit our discussion from Episodes 146 and 148 regarding the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's opinion redrawing congressional maps in that state. The U.S. Supreme Court -- and yes, that's the Brett Kavanaugh-and-Neil-Gorsuch-laden Supreme Court! -- just declined to intervene to protect the Republicans. Why is that, and how is that a map forward? We tell all!
Then, we return to the Gary Hart story we discussed last episode. Was Hart really set up? Listen and find out!
Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #100 that is the dreaded real property question Thomas needs to get right in order to hit "60% at the half." Can he do it?!?? You'll have to listen and find out! And, of course, if you'd like to play along with us, just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag. We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry!
Appearances
None! If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.
Show Notes & Links
- Click here to read the cert petition in Turzai v. Brandt and here to read the opposition.
- This is the James Savage response on Gary Hart.
Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!
For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki
And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | We have Reese the Verde already. |
| 0:04.5 | We all just kind of looked at each other and nodded. |
| 0:06.6 | We find the defended guilty of charges. |
| 0:09.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:10.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:11.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:12.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:13.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:14.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:15.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:16.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:17.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:18.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
| 0:19.4 | Wait 105? |
| 0:20.4 | Yeah. |
| 0:21.4 | In your broth. |
| 0:22.4 | Your Honor, I am checked. |
| 0:23.4 | You would. |
| 0:24.4 | Bastard. |
| 0:25.4 | Hey! |
| 0:26.4 | Quiet. |
| 0:27.4 | ["The Best of Us"] |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

