meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA219: Harvard and Affirmative Action

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Law, Opinion, Politics, News, Liberal, Legal, Supremecourt, Harvard, Atheist

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 19 October 2018

⏱️ 81 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's Rapid Response Friday takes us to the front lines of the affirmative action debate with the trial of Students For Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard, a lawsuit brought by a single-issue right-wing activist determined to end diversity as a criterion in school admissions.  (And yes, we tell you what we really think!)

We begin, however, with some news regarding the Monsanto trial we profiled back in Episode 202.

After that, it's time for a deep dive into the nuances of affirmative action with the SFFA v. Harvard lawsuit.  What exactly does it allege?  What's the status of affirmative action law?  Where is this lawsuit going?  Listen and find out!

Then it's time for a brief Andrew Was segment, in which Andrew Was Wrong about the UK Supreme Court, and Andrew Was... Something... about the good news coming out of the Florida Supreme Court.

Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #98 regarding constitutional standards.  Thomas needs to go 2-for-3 after a recent audit showed a bank error in his favor.  Can he do it?  You'll have to listen and find out!  And, of course, if you'd like to play along with us, just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag.  We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry!

Appearances

None!  If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. We first covered the Monsanto trial back in Episode 202; go check it out!
  2. Click here to read the Students For Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard lawsuit.
  3. To understand the history of affirmative action, listen to our Episode 93, and check out both Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) and Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), the cases we discussed in the episode.
  4. I mentioned the Etzkowitz et al. article on critical mass; you can read that here.

Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law

Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!

For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki

And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Avatar the Way of Water is now streaming on Disney+.

0:03.6

Come on, come on!

0:07.2

Relive the adventure of a lifetime.

0:09.8

Outstanding.

0:11.0

Woohoo!

0:12.4

Experience the Academy Award-winning phenomenon.

0:17.1

Again and again.

0:19.8

You are one of us.

0:20.8

Yeah, let's do it.

0:23.7

Avatar the Way of Water, now streaming on Disney+.

0:26.8

Subscription required, 18+.

0:28.7

Terms a Conditions Apply.

0:32.9

We have Reastro Verde already.

0:34.6

We all just kind of look at each other and not it.

0:36.7

We find the Defended guilty of charges.

0:49.2

Wait 105?

0:51.1

Yeah, in your broth.

0:53.1

Your Honor, I am Chen.

0:54.3

You would!

0:55.2

Bastard!

0:55.6

Hey!

0:56.2

Quiet!

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.