OA215: Is Gamble v US the Real Reason Behind Kavanaugh?
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 5 October 2018
⏱️ 78 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Today's Rapid Response Friday tackles the #1 emailed story to us this past week: is the real story behind the Kavanaugh nomination that the Trump administration needs him on the Supreme Court to rule in Gamble v. U.S. regarding the dual sovereignty doctrine as it applies to double jeopardy?
We begin with a quick note about the New York Times story on Trump's taxes which will be covered on Serious Inquiries Only.
Then it's time to figure out this claim about Gamble v. U.S. that fact-checking website Snopes rated as "true." Is it, though? (Hint: no.) We'll tell you everything you need to know about the 5th Amendment's double jeopardy clause and what it might mean for anyone Trump pardons once Kavanaugh gets to the Court.
And speaking of which, we segue from that claim to an update on all things Kavanaugh this week, including the Mitchell letter, the FBI investigation, Flake's statements, and even (gasp!) an Andrew Was Wrong.
Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #96 regarding the breach of an employment contract, with next week's guest Chad Schneider playing along. Thomas needs to go 5-for-5... can he do it? You'll have to listen and find out! And, of course, if you'd like to play along with us, just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag. We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry!
Appearances
Thomas will be at QED in Manchester, UK on Oct. 13 and 14.
Show Notes & Links
- You can read the New York Times story on Trump's taxes, and listen for Thomas's take on Serious Inquiries Only.
- The leading case on the "dual sovereign" doctrine as applied to the double jeopardy clause is Heath v. Alabama, 474 U.S. 82 (1985).
- Click here to read the administration's opposition brief in Gamble v. U.S., and here to check out the entire docket.
- This is the Jed Shugerman article we referenced regarding New York's "dual sovereigns" law.
Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law
Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/
Don't forget the OA Facebook Community!
For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki
And email us at openarguments@gmail.com
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | We have Reese the Verde already. |
| 0:04.5 | We all just kind of looked at each other and nodded. |
| 0:06.6 | We find the defended guilty of charges. |
| 0:09.4 | Wait 105? |
| 0:17.9 | Yeah. |
| 0:18.8 | In your broth. |
| 0:19.8 | Your honor, I am Chad. |
| 0:21.3 | You would. |
| 0:22.3 | Bastard. |
| 0:23.3 | Hey! |
| 0:24.3 | Quiet! |
| 0:25.3 | Whether it's racist or stardry or stardry, there is no basis for imposing some draconian |
| 0:35.2 | policy with regard to bail, nunch, potouc. |
| 0:37.7 | Your honor, the defense is now just making up worse. |
| 0:41.9 | We can't make your trial. |
| 0:46.1 | Oh, look how cute there's like a judge in everything. |
| 0:50.0 | In jury people. |
| 0:51.0 | So proud! |
| 0:52.0 | Ladies! |
| 0:54.0 | Welcome to opening arguments. |
| 0:56.6 | The podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer. |
| 1:00.2 | This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P.A. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

