meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA204: The Perjury Trap (w/guest Randall Eliason)

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Law, Opinion, Politics, News, Liberal, Legal, Supremecourt, Harvard, Atheist

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 28 August 2018

⏱️ 78 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's episode welcomes back one of our favorite guest experts, former prosecutor and current law professor Randall Eliason of the Sidebars blog, who will help us break down what exactly a "perjury trap" is -- and whether Robert Mueller is laying one for the President. Of course, when we have a guest this good, we also have to take advantage of his expertise in a couple of other areas.  So we begin by checking in on the news of the day:  Mueller has already reportedly offered immunity to David Pecker, the CEO of the National Inquirer, whom we discussed at great length on Episode 203 in connection with the Cohen plea. After that, we delve into Rudy Giuliani's contention that Mueller is laying a "perjury trap" for the President.  Is that a thing?  Is that what he's doing?  Listen and find out! After that, we revisit the issue of reporters and confidential sources, where Professor Eliason has been a consistent voice opposing a federal privilege.  Is that a view he still holds?  There's only one way to know for sure! Finally, it's time for the answer to Thomas Takes the Bar Exam, where our intrepid hero tries to inch closer to the coveted 60% mark with a question about torts.  Remember to follow our Twitter feed (@Openargs) and like our Facebook Page so that you too can play along with #TTTBE! Recent Appearances None! If you'd like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links
  1. Prof. Eliason first guested on the show way back in Episode 70.
  2. Here is the link to the NPR interview with Prof. Eliason discussed on the show.
  3. To read more of Prof. Eliason's work, click here to visit the Sidebars blog.
  4. Here is a transcript of Prof. Eliason's statement on reporter's privilege in the age of Trump.
Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki And email us at openarguments@gmail.com Direct Download

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

We have Reese the Verde already.

0:04.5

We all just kind of looked at each other and nodded.

0:06.6

We find the defended guilty of charges.

0:09.5

Wait 105?

0:11.5

Yeah.

0:12.5

In your broth.

0:13.5

Your honor, I am Jim.

0:15.0

You would.

0:16.0

Bastard.

0:17.0

Hey!

0:18.0

Quiet!

0:19.0

Whether it's racist or starrie or starrie diseases, there is no basis for imposing some

0:34.4

draconian policy with regard to bail, nunch, potonk.

0:37.6

Your honor, the defense is now just making up worse.

0:41.6

We can't make this your trial.

0:45.8

Oh, look how cute there's like a judge and everything in jury people.

0:51.3

So proud!

0:52.3

Ladies.

0:55.3

Welcome to Opening Arguments, a podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real

0:59.1

life lawyer.

1:00.3

This podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P. Antitora's LLC for entertainment purposes

1:05.4

is not intended as legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.