meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA184: Families at the Border

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Law, Opinion, Politics, News, Liberal, Legal, Supremecourt, Harvard, Atheist

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 22 June 2018

⏱️ 76 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's Rapid Response Friday helps separate fact from fiction when it comes to the heartwrenching issue of families being separated at the border.  Is the Trump administration to blame?  Did the recent Executive Order fix the problem?  Listen and find out. First, though, we bring back (almost) everyone's favorite segment:  Andrew Was Wrong!  Specifically, Andrew was wrong when he predicted back in Episode 83 that Maajid Nawaz didn't have much of a defamation case against the Southern Poverty Law center, and in Episode 84 that he didn't have much leverage, either.  Well, both of those predictions looked foolish now that the SPLC has agreed to pay Nawaz $3,375,000 and issue an unconditional apology. In the main segment, we break down Trump's EO regarding separating families at the border and requesting a modification to the Flores v. Reno settlement.  It's bad.  And if it weren't bad enough, we also discuss the administration's change in asylum policy. After that, we discuss the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Pereira v. Sessions.  Surely that can't be bad news, too?  (Don't call us Shirley.) Finally, we end with an all new Thomas Takes The Bar Exam #81 involving the constitutionality of a state legislature retaliating against two professors for pushing campus speech codes.  Have we piqued your interest yet?  Listen and find out!  And if you'd like to play along , just retweet our episode on Twitter or share it on Facebook along with your guess and the #TTTBE hashtag.  We'll release the answer on next Tuesday's episode along with our favorite entry! Recent Appearances Andrew was recently a guest on the David Pakman Show, with a two-part appearance discussing whether President Trump can be indicted and if so, whether he can pardon himself.  You can watch the video on YouTube. Show Notes & Links
  1. We first discussed Maajid Nawaz's legal threats in Episode 83 and Episode 84.  You can read the final Settlement Agreement for yourself as well as check out the SPLC's apology to Nawaz.
  2. Click here to read the Snopes article conclusively debunking the political claim that this policy was put into place "by Democrats."
  3. You can read Trump's recent Executive Order and also check out the original 1997 Flores v. Reno settlement.
  4. The operative laws discussed during the main segment were:  8 U.S.C. § 1158 (asylum); 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (“improper entry by alien”); and, of course, 18 U.S.C. § 46 (“transportation of water hyacinths”).  You can also read the Attorney General's Interim Decision #3929 on refugees for yourself.
  5. As promised, this is the full list of Class B federal misdemeanors.
  6. We also discussed this Washington Post article on refugees being turned away at the border.
  7. This is the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Pereira v. Sessions.
  8. Finally, a secret Yodel for you folks who read the show notes:  here's the link to the news that Michael Cohen's fired his old lawyers (McDermott, Will & Emery) and hired a new one (Guy Petrillo).  What does this mean?  Only time will tell.
Support us on Patreon at:  patreon.com/law Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/ Don't forget the OA Facebook Community! And email us at openarguments@gmail.com

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

He thought I was going to read me my rights.

0:04.3

You have the right to have your face kicked in by me.

0:06.3

You have the right to have your balls stomp by him.

0:08.4

I'll wait where I'm at.

0:18.6

They're pretty simple.

0:19.8

The forms are all standard, boilerplate.

0:21.8

OK, well, we're all hungry.

0:23.0

We're going to get to our hot plate soon enough.

0:24.5

All right, let's talk about the contract here.

0:26.7

Sorry.

0:31.0

You'd be surprised how many doors a letter from a lawyer

0:34.2

can open or close.

0:36.1

It seems like you're talking slower

0:37.7

since you started charging by the hour.

0:44.6

What's the meaning of this?

0:45.4

This is my quiet time.

0:46.4

We're going to have to take you into custody.

0:48.4

That's outrageous.

0:49.2

What am I charged with?

0:50.0

Don't have to tell you anymore.

0:51.3

Clearly haven't been reading your Scalia.

0:55.0

Welcome to Opening Arguments, a podcast that

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.