OA162: Tariffs and Trade
Opening Arguments
Opening Arguments Media LLC
4.3 • 3.7K Ratings
🗓️ 6 April 2018
⏱️ 64 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
- Andrew was wrong links: 15 U.S.C. § 260a (time zones), Florida HB 1013, and, if you want to re-listen to our discussion of the emoluments lawsuit, check out Episode 160.
- In the main segment, the guys discuss the Trade Act of 1974. This is the CNN list of the 106 products on which China is raising tariffs, and this is a link to the New York Times article suggesting that the Trump administration is considering re-joining the TPP.
- This is the Alex van der Zwaan sentencing memorandum; he pled guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 1001. If you'd like to plot that out on the Sentencing Guidelines table, you can do so by clicking here.
- You can click here to read the Christopher Miller story suggesting that "Person A" is Konstantin Kilimnik; that was just validated by this report from Business Insider.
- Finally, you can click here to read the DOJ's response to Manafort's motion to dismiss. For reference, This is Rod Rosenstein’s Order appointing Mueller, No. 3915-2017, and this is 28 U.S.C. § 515, which plainly authorizes it. We discussed this in full detail back in Episode 136.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Your honor, I object! |
| 0:05.0 | And why is that Mr. Reed? |
| 0:07.0 | Because it's devastating to my case! |
| 0:19.0 | I did, you know, the murders, but as you're all so looking forward to this, I thought I'd be not guilty. |
| 0:31.0 | They say a man who represents himself as a fool for a client. |
| 0:35.0 | Well, with God as my witness, I am that fool! |
| 0:45.0 | Mr. Simpson, this is the most blatant case of fraudulent advertising since my suit against the film the never-ending store. |
| 0:53.0 | Welcome to Opening Arguments, the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with a real-life lawyer. |
| 1:00.0 | This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P. Antitoura as LLC for entertainment purposes, |
| 1:05.0 | is not intended as legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship. |
| 1:09.0 | Don't take legal advice from a podcast. |
| 1:13.0 | Hello and welcome to Opening Arguments, this is episode 162. How's it going Andrew? |
| 1:24.0 | It's going great Thomas, how are you? |
| 1:26.0 | Doing great, I was just thinking 162, that's like a tenth of the number of games that are in a baseball season. |
| 1:31.0 | Or is it no, it's close to the number of... |
| 1:33.0 | It is precisely... |
| 1:35.0 | Oh, okay. |
| 1:36.0 | I mean, they're in groups of 10 though, it's too strenuous to actually count them all out. |
| 1:42.0 | So I'm pretty sure there's a tenth of it, but that's just what it feels like. |
| 1:47.0 | Anyway, really excited to be with you guys today. |
| 1:50.0 | We've got fun, Andrew was wrong segment. |
| 1:54.0 | Oh, that's really good. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

