So moving forward.

So moving forward here, Brian, we do have a couple of mailback questions, a couple super chats. Just a couple, yeah. Yeah, we won't make it a full segment. We'll just kind of get to these real quick. We'll start off of Patrick McGrane. Super chat from Patrick. Thank you, Patrick. I think their rankings are based purely on perceived talent. Guys like Maparoil are realizing that Notre Dame actually has a lot of talent and not just

one or two high-end players.

Honestly, Patrick, I think that's a great comment.

I don't think that some of these coaches even really think they really have more than

one high-em.

I think there's some writers who probably don't know who Leonard Moore is.

How does the editors, Schlebeau and the editors, looked at at Notre names list and we're like yeah we we should probably nobody said we should probably add Leonard more to this at least top returners list you can't even give me the top returners list I get it you got 25 teams you got to write a blurb about you can't include every player I went through that I'm like I got to delete that because this is now getting really freaking long. And if I do this for every team, it's going to take me three weeks.

But you couldn't even list them on the top returning starters list.

Tells me you don't know who the heck he is.

That's pretty sad for a college football writer not to have, man.

I was about to say you can't even put in like a backhanded compliment of like Leonard Moore had a great freshman season. Let's see if he can repeat it in year two. Right. You have no concept of who he is. Like he's not even a thing to you in your mind. I think Patrick's point is spot on. I think there's a lot of writers who live more by narratives. Oh, yeah. That's why with Greg McElroy, I agree with some

stuff he says and don't agree with other things because it's more of he's made, whereas a lot of these

sports are something, I just disagree with almost everything you're saying right now because it's all

just lazy analysis with some other guys like McElroy, David Pollock, there's things we agree on

things we don't agree on.

You're going to get more of that when it's actual football analysis because it's all, it's subjective. I can look at this team and say, hey, I think this team is more talented than you do because I'm making a subjective opinion on their offensive line or their quarterback or whatever the case may be. And so it's a different type.

There's a level of consistency to that.

Well, it doesn't matter to me about the experience of a quarterback as much as the talent.

Well, then why do you have this first?

Because I just don't think that guy's that good.

Yeah.

...