by so hold if Texas doesn't win the title people start questioning if Sark is the guy at Texas.

I think it depends on how far they go.

And I'd be very curious what the chat thinks about this.

Because I have, like, I think Sark's getting a little bit too much love,

but I also like Sark as a coach.

I think he's done a good job. Like, look, they've gone to back to back. It's like finding that middle ground of what you have to evaluate a coach to where we're not overhyping them, but we're also not banging on every mistake that he's made. We also want a title. Well, they haven't won a title since in 20 years. I mean, so like,

and when was the last time they won a title before night, 2005? That was the Texas's first

championship of my lifetime. And so like, like, and I'm 47 years old, and Texas has won one national

championship in my life. Looking at their claimed national titles,

their last title before 05 was 1970.

So this is not a program that's winning titles all the time.

So it's,

and this is a coach who took them to the semifinals in back to back years.

That's a heck of an

accomplishment. It's just, why are we putting him over dabbo for the, you know, for, for, resume? Why are we acting like he's his elite coach? Like, some of the passes I'm willing to give Dan Lannning or Marcus Freeman, I'm not giving Sark because Sark's been a head coach for over a decade. He's just kind of new at Texas.

But if they go to the semifinals again, that's a Sark, because Sark's been a head coach for over a decade. He's just kind of new at Texas.

But if they go to the semifinals again, that's a great accomplishment.

Will there be some Texas fans to start saying, we're not spending this much money to go to

semifinals?

Yeah, absolutely.

Understand it.

And so I think if they go to semifinals again, while that's a great accomplishment,

...