Since Donald Trump won the election last week, Democrats in the mainstream media have been in panic mode.

Much of this panic is centered around a powerful online subculture, loosely known as the

manosphere. The political messaging starts when they are so young. So the idea that someone is going

out and voting for Donald Trump after listening to one podcast from Aidan Ross is just completely,

completely wrong. This week on Power User, we're diving deep into the manosphere and asking,

can Democrats win young men back on the internet in a way that doesn't radicalize them further?

Hey, everyone, Ellie here, wishing you a happy Friday. Well, another week and Donald Trump is, of course, back in the courtroom. He almost seems to live in the courtroom now. One thing I wanted to point out in this week's piece, though, is the way that all of these cases are connected. Sometimes in a way that is not necessarily obvious

in a way we might not necessarily see

unless we sort of dig in a little bit.

So I hope you find this one interesting.

As always, I do love to hear your thoughts, questions, and comments.

Keep them coming to Letters at Cafe.com.

A federal jury in New York is about to award, or perhaps by the time you're hearing this,

just did award a multi-million dollar verdict to E. Jean Carroll, who alleged, of course,

that former President Donald Trump had sexually assaulted and then defamed her.

But behind that verdict sits a nearly forgotten but pivotal piece of history.

If Attorney General Merrick Garland had stuck to his original determination about that case,

Carol would have gotten nothing.

Only Garland's late-breaking, politically expedient turnabout rescued Carol's claim, and it might have saved DOJ's ongoing criminal prosecution of Trump himself.

It's all connected, indeed.

Now, here's the backstory.

After Carol first sued Trump in 2019, then Attorney General Bill Barr, one of our show's

...