Is there a state-sponsored discrimination in America? Yes, there is. And it's coming from the Biden Administration.

Also, how inflation isn't just a hidden tax. It's theft. This is the Dineshtus who's a podcast.

America needs this voice. The times are crazy. And the time of confusion, division and lies. We need a brave voice of reason understanding and truth. This is the Dineshtus Sousa podcast.

Is there a state-sponsored discrimination going on in America today? Incredibly, there is. But you know what? It's coming from the Biden Administration.

So here is the incredible irony. The very party that says that it's fighting racism, that it's identifying white supremacy as the problem that is mobilized to act is the party that is using the government to discriminate against citizens based on their race. Wow.

Now, when I was at the Michelin del Raleigh this past weekend, I was chatting with Diamond and Silk in our little trailer before we went up to the stage. And Diamond and Silk were saying to me, they're like,

we keep hearing about racism and we separately keep hearing about discrimination. So what is the relationship between those two things? Are they the same thing? Is racism and discrimination? Are they synonyms for each other? And I said, no, they're actually two different things.

You could argue that one comes out of the other, perhaps you could say, racism is the theory and discrimination is the practice. But racism by itself is a system of beliefs. It's a system of thought.

If I believe that another ethnic group is not just inferior, but intrinsically inferior, you may say biologically inferior. That's racism. That is the classic meaning of racism.

But discrimination is not a thought. It's an action to discriminate is to make a choice, to make a preference based upon race. That's racial discrimination.

And in some ways, when we think about America after the Civil War, in other words, after slavery, it's really primarily discrimination. That is the problem. Even more than racism, per se. Why? Well, for the simple reason, imagine a country, let's just say, full of races.

But no one discriminates. So lots of people think, let's say, blacks are inferior or Latinos are inferior, but they don't do anything about it. And then the question becomes, so what?

So what if in your mind you think something, but you don't segregate, you don't discriminate, you don't deny blacks, opportunities or jobs, you don't act in any way that enforces your theory.

Well, in that case, racism would be sort of a paper, a tiger would be completely harmless. It's the discrimination, if you will, that puts the evil into action. And that's why, by the way, our civil rights laws, on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no discrimination on the basis of race or gender or sex.

Now, the remarkable thing is, the Biden administration is actually discriminating in exactly this way. And it's doing so in a manner that flatly contradicts the Civil Rights Act of 1960 for flatly contradicts the idea of equal rights under the law.

The good news is that judges are striking these Biden administration policies down. So let's look at two of them. The first one is the Biden administration's policy of using its COVID restaurant relief program, but making that program available to on a preferential basis to black and Latino and Asian Pacific Islander restaurant owners.

In other words, I won't say no whites need apply, but it's close to that because it's sort of like if you're whites, get to the back of the bus, get to the back of the line. Why? Because they've defined socially disadvantaged in such a way that in order to be socially disadvantaged, you have to be quote a person of color.

Now, Greer's Ranch Cafe, which lost out on its COVID benefits during the pandemic, sued and won. And the court basically said, no Biden administration, you cannot do this. Stop this.

So the Biden administration goes, oh, that's in Texas, these Texans, you know what, we'll appeal it. And so they appealed to judge top are this is at the United States Court of Appeals for the sixth circuit. But guess what? They lost again. And here I'm now going to quote from judge top are because this quote is so telling this case is about whether the government can allocate limited coronavirus relief funds based on the race and sex of the applicants.

We hold that it cannot, it cannot. So in other words, you can't discriminate on the basis of race in either direction in favor of whites or in favor of blacks. It is unconstitutional. It is not permitted.

Now, the Biden administration had a second program and this was a program to provide race based relief for farmers. And the idea here is that the government, the Biden administration would had a loan forgiveness program for farmers and ranchers.

This was under section one thousand five of the so called American Rescue Plan Act. But the a bunch of farmers who were not eligible for this, not eligible because I'm now going to read the Biden administration's definition of a socially disadvantaged group. See how telling this is a group whose members have been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice because of their identity as members of a group without regard to their individual qualities.

...