Hey Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the No Spin News Thursday, December 10, 2020. Stand up for your country. Happy Hanukkah to our Jewish viewers. Have a good time. I know it's hard in the age of COVID. But, you know,

it's not that we can do. Gotta make the best of it. So, it is Hanukkah begins this evening. All right, so the big story everybody knows the big story. And I'm going to get into this in a way that I hope will be helpful to you. So, state of Texas in a lawsuit that's very, very well thought out. Has petition the Supreme Court of the United States to vacate the vote in four states. All right, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin,

Wisconsin, and Michigan. This state of Texas is saying to the court, there was fraud in these votes in those four states because the states did not live up to their own constitution.

So, the voting apparatus in Pennsylvania, for example, violated what the Pennsylvania Constitution says and for the other states as well. Okay, that is not a real debatable issue.

Those four states did violate their own mandates, their own state mandates. They did. Now, they have excuses COVID this, that the other thing. But, that's where the state of Texas starts.

And then it says to the Supreme Court, look, all of our people in Texas who voted for Donald Trump are disenfranchised. Their vote is negated by illegality in those four swing states.

So, that's a constitutional issue that you, the Supreme Court, have to deal with. And you have to find a remedy for it. That's the key word, remedy for it.

So, 18 other states, and I'm going to name them, have joined with Texas state the same thing. And it is a very clever, well thought out, lost it. Here are the states.

Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Arizona, and West Virginia, no Arizona, did not go for Trump.

But, the state legislature is Republican. So, they have joined this suit. That's interesting. That's the only state that is in there with Texas that voted against Donald Trump, Arizona. Isn't that interesting?

Now, the Supreme Court's in a tight spot. As you know, it dismissed the Pennsylvania law. So, it just wouldn't even hear it.

You know, and the thinking was, look, you had a year to correct this, Pennsylvania, and you didn't do it in the year. So, why you bother us now? You reap what you saw.

That was the rationalization for the court to say, we're not going to get involved with this. Here, it's a little more complicated.

But, I still think that the Supreme Court is not going to take the case. They won't hear it. And they'll say the state of Texas does not have, quote, unquote, standing to sue the other states on election issues when the states themselves are responsible for how they conduct the elections, which is true, which is why we need a new federal law that there are some standards.

Okay, now I could be wrong on that. Supreme Court to say, all right, we're going to hear this, and we're going to stay everything until we decide.

But remember, if the court does that, they have to find the nine justices have to find a remedy for the four swing states not upholding their own constitution.

What would the remedy be? You're going to throw out those electoral votes? Well, if they do that, then Trump wins.

And then the election is overturned, and then there's massive violence all over the country. Now, I know you're going to write to me saying, well, that shouldn't be a consideration.

Judges should just rule on a constitution. But here, there are a lot of variables.

And whenever a justice or a judge rules, they should be taking into account what the consequences of the ruling may be.

So, Roe v Wade, for example, when this Supreme Court ruled it was legal in a USA to have an abortion, the consequence was that hundreds of millions of babies, or potential human beings, or whatever you want to describe it at, were exterminated.

And that was the consequence. Now, if I'm a Supreme Court justice, I don't want that on my conscience.

...