Well, to use a 15-year-old internet meme, the number of charges against Donald Trump is now more than 9,000 and growing.

And this brings up an interesting question.

Hi, everybody, I'm Bill Whittle here with Steve Green and Scott Ott.

And guys, the question doesn't particularly apply to Donald Trump.

It's a real problem.

And the question is this, if the charges against Donald Trump had been brought by the Supreme Court or something, then I would think, well, this is fairly serious.

But when you think about the total number of DAs that are in the country and how local and how small they are, we have developed a system now where the smallest player can throw a

wrench into the entire operation of the U.S. government. Some judge somewhere can issue a stay

against something that's been passed by Congress, and we're just crippled by this until we find

out what, you know, what Ebenezer wants for his, for his, for his, um,

release the country from his judicial, um, statement. So that's what I'm really interested in, guys.

I think if you want to look at the case of Donald Trump, Steve, I'm, I'm in favor of, of abiding by the law, obviously. I'd like the presidential candidates

to be lawful people. And I'd like that to apply equally to both parties. But one of the things

that is the strongest evidence to me of Donald Trump's, if not his innocence, then certainly

his lack of significant you know, significant guilt

is how far down the ladder you have to go to find a prosecutor willing to press charges.

This is a powerful argument, you know, in anything, is where, what level is your opposition

stooping to? If their entire credentials are from a guy

who wrote a paper once you know when he was in college it doesn't throw a whole lot of weight so

what do we do about this what uh what's interesting here what is what is her name the uh the fulton county

it's fanny willis i'm sorry penny willis right? Fannie Willis. I'm sorry, Penny Willis, thank you.

Corrupt as hell, by the way.

...