We're closing it on the April 22nd deadline for the ceasefire with Iran. What happens if we get to that

point and no resolution has been met? That's a big TBD that we're all wondering. Now, remember this

past weekend, Vice President J.D. Vance traveled to Pakistan where the Pakistanis mediated between

the United States and Iran, trying to come up with some kind of resolution to this conflict.

Out of that, no resolution

to the conflict existed. I'm willing to bet some strategy was going into that. Both parties standing

in the ground. I did note, I think it is interesting that Iran really did not capitulate in that

meeting. You would think after being just kind of hammered away for the last month that they would be ready for a reprieve

and ready to bring an into this. There's a lot of bad faith negotiation and a lot of bad faith

propaganda going on. I think this comes from a legitimate misunderstanding. I think the Iranians thought

that the ceasefire included Lebanon and it just didn't. We never made that

promise. We never indicated that was going to be the case. What we said is that the ceasefire

would be focused on Iran, and the ceasefire would be focused on America's allies, both Israel

and the Gulf Arab states. If Iran wants to let this negotiation fall apart in a conflict

where they were getting hammered over

Lebanon, which has nothing to do with them and which the United States never once said was

part of the ceasefire. That's ultimately their choice. We think that would be dumb, but that's their

choice. Maybe they see the fact that they know they have two weeks to deal and they might have

the ability to apply more pressure.

Maybe the United States is applying more pressure. As we see the United States,

blockade the blockade. Now, I know there have been some great memes and comments made about

the blockade of the blockade. I am willing to bet that there are some more things at play here

...