Niall Ferguson on Catastrophe
TALKING POLITICS
Catherine Carr
4.7 • 2.5K Ratings
🗓️ 20 May 2021
⏱️ 36 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
We talk to the historian Niall Ferguson about the politics of catastrophe, from pandemics and famines to world wars and climate change. Have we been worrying about the right things? Why have some countries done so much better than others with Covid? And what can history teach us about the worst that can happen? Plus, how likely is it that a cold war between the US and China turns hot?
Talking Points:
Niall argues that COVID is more like the Asian flu in ‘57/’58 than the 1918/1919 Spanish flu.
- However the economic response is unprecedented; the Internet made lockdowns at this scale and duration possible.
- Lockdowns were a near panic response that were necessitated by initial political failures in the West.
When we’re trying to assess the political impact of a disaster, the body count is not the most important thing.
- A disaster can kill a lot of people and be virtually forgotten if it doesn’t have cascading consequences.
- We will probably remember the experience of lockdown more than the mortality rates.
What did we get wrong about the COVID response?
- Controlling travel early on made a difference, and most Western states did not do that.
- The network structure of a polity is the most important thing in a pandemic, especially in an era of globalized travel.
The distinction between natural and manmade disasters is a false one.
- The scale of impact is a function of how we, collectively and our leaders, individually make decisions.
- Humans do not seem to be very good at thinking pragmatically about risks; we tend to ignore them in practice while simultaneously constructing apocalyptic fantasies.
Mentioned in this Episode:
- Niall’s book, Doom: The Politics of Catastrophe
- Larry Summers and David Cutler on the costs of COVID
- Graham Allison, Destined for War
Further Learning:
- More on Taiwan’s COVID response
- Why do so many people live near active volcanoes?
- ‘The Really Big One’ (the earthquake that will devastate the Pacific Northwest)
- The Talking Politics Guide to… Existential Risk
And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello my name is David Runtzman and this is Talking Politics. Today we're talking with |
| 0:14.1 | the historian Neil Ferguson about the politics of doom, catastrophe and all the bad things. |
| 0:24.5 | Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Reviewer Books, a literary |
| 0:28.9 | magazine full of politics and a political magazine full of literature. |
| 0:33.8 | Listeners can subscribe at a special rate of just one pound an issue by using URL lrb.me-talk. |
| 0:42.7 | That's lrb.me-talk. |
| 0:47.1 | How nice spoke to Neil Ferguson about a week ago? He was in California, it was morning, |
| 0:58.8 | his time, it was evening our time. He had children to get ready for school, you might just |
| 1:03.5 | hear that in the background, a very, very small version of doom. We cover a lot in this conversation |
| 1:10.6 | with all the different varieties of catastrophe from war to famine to climate change, but |
| 1:16.5 | we started with the obvious place, how does the current pandemic compare to pandemics |
| 1:21.9 | of the past? |
| 1:23.9 | Neil in this book you set the pandemic against both the long history of pandemics and |
| 1:29.0 | also the bigger history of other kinds of disasters and catastrophes, wars, famines and |
| 1:33.6 | so on. Come on to the other ones in a bit, but on the pandemic to pandemic comparison you |
| 1:38.2 | make the point that Covid in many ways fused more like the so called Asian flu, 5758 than |
| 1:45.9 | the big one, the Spanish flu of 1918-19. Is that just a question of scale? Are we just |
| 1:52.4 | talking about this as a numerical comparison? Do you think that the comparison holds |
| 1:56.0 | in other ways? |
| 1:57.0 | Neil in this book you have to start with the numbers and if you look back to 1918-19, |
| 2:03.4 | which was the pandemic most often referred to last year when people were trying to get |
| 2:08.4 | a handle on this, 39 million people we think died in that pandemic and if you up that to |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

