Jeffrey, I mean this is amazing, right?

There's one thing to keep saying that clearly the wheels have come off and things are crumbling

down, but they're already now throwing people on the bus, pointing fingers, which means

we're way past them accepting that this was a disaster.

They now know it's a disaster and now they're going to try and rewrite the history around

it.

But what is this all about?

What is this John Hopkinskin study that's being referenced?

Yeah, now there's so much spin going on out there.

We have some work to do today.

So this John Hopkins study, now Jen Psaki was talking about the John Hopkins study when

she was questioned about it.

She said, we've never really supported lockdowns.

Well, let's go right to the John Hopkins study and people can read it for themselves.

It's a literature review of a meta-analysis of the effects of lockdowns like COVID-19

mortality.

This, John Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics and Global Health.

They looked at 24 meta-analysis to go through this paper throughout the world.

And in this paper, now here's where Jen Psaki either didn't read the paper.

Or she's playing word games to confuse you because in the paper, it says, lockdowns are

defined as an imposition of at least one compulsory non-pharmaceutical interventions.

That's closing of schools, that's closing businesses, that's mandating of face masks.

...