meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
In Our Time: Science

Negative Numbers

In Our Time: Science

BBC

History

4.51.4K Ratings

🗓️ 9 March 2006

⏱️ 42 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss negative numbers, a history of mystery and suspicion. In 1759 the British mathematician Francis Maseres wrote that negative numbers "darken the very whole doctrines of the equations and make dark of the things which are in their nature excessively obvious and simple". Because of their dark and mysterious nature, Maseres concluded that negative numbers did not exist, as did his contemporary, William Friend. However, other mathematicians were braver. They took a leap into the unknown and decided that negative numbers could be used during calculations, as long as they had disappeared upon reaching the solution. The history of negative numbers is one of stops and starts. The trailblazers were the Chinese who by 100 BC were able to solve simultaneous equations involving negative numbers. The Ancient Greeks rejected negative numbers as absurd, by 600 AD, the Indians had written the rules for the multiplication of negative numbers and 400 years later, Arabic mathematicians realised the importance of negative debt. But it wasn't until the Renaissance that European mathematicians finally began to accept and use these perplexing numbers. Why were negative numbers considered with such suspicion? Why were they such an abstract concept? And how did they finally get accepted? With Ian Stewart , Professor of Mathematics at the University of Warwick; Colva Roney-Dougal , Lecturer in Pure Mathematics at the University of St Andrews; Raymond Flood , Lecturer in Computing Studies and Mathematics at Kellogg College, Oxford.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thanks for down learning the In Our Time podcast. For more details about In Our Time and for our terms of use, please go to BBC.co.uk.

0:09.0

I hope you enjoy the program.

0:11.0

Hello, in 1759 the British mathematician Francis Massarese wrote that negative

0:16.4

numbers quote, darken the very whole doctrine of the equations and make dark of the things

0:22.1

which are in their nature excessively obvious and simple.

0:25.0

Because of their dark and mysterious nature,

0:27.0

Masa has concluded that negative numbers didn't exist,

0:30.0

as did his contemporary William Friend.

0:32.0

However, other mathematicians were braver. exist as did his contemporary William Friend.

0:32.6

However, other mathematicians were braver.

0:35.2

They took a leap into the unknown and decided that negative numbers could be used during

0:38.9

calculations as long as they'd disappeared upon reaching the solution.

0:43.4

The trailblazers were the Chinese who by 100 BC were able to solve simultaneous equations

0:48.2

involving negative numbers.

0:50.0

The ancient Greeks rejected negative numbers as absurd, but by 600 AD the Indians had written

0:55.0

the rules for the multiplication of negative numbers, and the 400 years later Arab mathematicians

0:59.7

realized the importance of negative debt.

1:02.2

But it wasn't until the renaissance that

1:03.5

European mathematicians finally began to accept and use these perplexing numbers.

1:07.6

Why were negative numbers considered with such suspicion? Why were they such an

1:11.8

abstract concept and how did they finally get accepted?

1:15.3

With me to discuss negative numbers are Ian Stewart, Professor of Mathematics at the University of

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.