meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
People I (Mostly) Admire

Nathan Myhrvold: “I Am Interested in Lots of Things, and That's Actually a Bad Strategy.” (Episode 6 Rebroadcast)

People I (Mostly) Admire

Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Society & Culture

4.61.9K Ratings

🗓️ 24 April 2021

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

He graduated high school at 14, and by 23 had several graduate degrees and was a research assistant with Stephen Hawking. He became the first chief technology officer at Microsoft (without having ever studied computer science) and then started a company focused on big questions — like how to provide the world with clean energy and how to optimize pizza-baking. Find out what makes Nathan Myhrvold’s fertile mind tick, and which of his many ideas Steve Levitt likes the most.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I started this podcast last fall to give me an excuse to talk to the smartest, weirdest,

0:10.8

most creative, and interesting people on the planet.

0:14.0

Since then, we've put out 25 episodes and things are going better than I ever could

0:18.0

have hoped.

0:19.0

Not only are it way more people listening than I expected, but these conversations have

0:23.1

spawned three or four brand new projects in partnership with my guests.

0:27.6

But one consequence of the explosion in the number of listeners over time is that most

0:31.8

of you probably never heard the early episodes.

0:35.0

With that in mind, I decided it would make sense from time to time to slip in re-broadcasts

0:39.2

of a few of my very favorite early interviews.

0:42.2

At the top of that list is my discussion with inventor Nathan Mirvold.

0:46.6

Nathan is truly one of the most brilliant, inspiring people I've ever met.

0:52.0

And weird too.

0:53.8

He spent his pandemic creating the highest resolution photo ever taken of a snowflake.

0:59.5

But also worked on the world's biggest problems, like how to supply clean energy to the globe.

1:15.0

Problems that are hard are usually hard because of the set of perspectives and tools that

1:23.0

have been used to try to solve them.

1:25.5

So you have to always ask, and I'm bringing something new to this problem.

1:31.1

And if you're not, then you should say, well, maybe I should either try to get a different

1:37.2

perspective or a different tool already, or maybe give it a rest and work on something

1:41.9

that I can build more progress with.

1:45.1

So there are people who know a lot about a few narrow topics.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.