Hey, everyone. On the last episode of Skeptico, you might recall that I introduced you to this new

pod I've started, AI Truth Ethics. I've gotten some feedback and I'm really encouraged that so many

of you saw the connection between what I've been doing on Skeptico for the longest time

and kind of the future of the implementation of this, just follow the data, look for the truth, ethos that I've always been about.

Because that's what I'm really doing with AI.

So I'm glad that so many of you got it and want to come along for the ride because I think it's going to be really good.

So the episode today is actually something I'm publishing on both channels.

And I think it's pretty self-explanatory.

A lot of the same stuff we're talking about.

But in a very interesting way, sounds different when we start talking about it for people outside of the community

we normally talk to.

Like us, they appear to have a population growth rate that's unsustainable.

And completely unsustainable as a coping mechanism.

Get it. And knowing this is unsustainable, NASA needs to prove itself, needs to bolster its purpose over and above civilian scientific research and discovery, okay?

It's unsustainable to do what Google's doing. It's unsustainable to say, I don't know how the electoral process works. It's a Chinese founding father thing where you're like, no, I know that's not true.

So I start really now doubting the other things that you're telling me.

I don't find any law of nature out there that says that we can't, like, blow ourselves up with AI.

I don't think it's definitely going to happen, but I do think it could happen.

Hey, Pi, I have an interview coming up with Nathan and Eric from the Cognitive Revolution

podcast.

We're actually doing a swapcast with my show.

And I thought we could hash out some of the introduction and maybe even tee up some of the

...