Nancy Guthrie: The Compromised Sheriff at the Center of This Case
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
True Crime Today
3.3 • 907 Ratings
🗓️ 30 March 2026
⏱️ 13 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
The investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance was always going to be difficult. An 84-year-old woman taken from her home in the middle of the night. No confirmed suspect. Ransom notes of uncertain origin. Nearly two months without proof of life. That's a hard case on its best day.
This is not its best day.
Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has now had his own deputies vote 241 to zero to demand he resign. According to records and reporting from the Arizona Republic and AZPM, documents from his time at the El Paso Police Department describe approximately 26 disciplinary allegations in six years — excessive force, firearms discharge, illegal gambling, insubordination, threatening behavior — before he resigned in 1982 in lieu of termination. His deputies say Pima County was never told. The union that cast that vote called it a direct response to those revelations, and called his concealment of that record a disqualifying failure of trust.
The Board of Supervisors has now voted unanimously to compel Nanos to answer under oath, with removal from office as a consequence for non-compliance. One supervisor has described his 42-year Pima County career as potentially "based on fraud." Reporting from the Arizona Republic and AZPM indicates that sworn testimony Nanos gave in a December 2025 deposition — about his suspension history — may be inconsistent with the documented record.
All of this while Nancy Guthrie is still missing. While the case turns on forensic evidence processed through a private Florida lab. While the federal presence holds firm despite the chaos at the top.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down what institutional collapse at the sheriff level does to an active kidnapping investigation — and whether the federal presence in this case can hold things together if Nanos goes.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #NoConfidenceVote #TrueCrime #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBIInvestigation #MissingPerson #BringNancyHome
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brewski and Robin Dree. |
| 0:07.8 | Let's continue the conversation about another aspect of this case. |
| 0:11.8 | Sheriff Nanos, his own deputies, just voted unanimously 241 to 0 to demand his resignation. |
| 0:20.2 | Records reported by the Arizona Republic show Sheriff Chris Nanos resigned from the El Paso Police Department in 1982 in lieu of termination |
| 0:29.8 | after allegedly accumulating 26 disciplinary allegations in five years, including excessive force and insubordination. |
| 0:37.4 | His deputies say none of that was disclosed when he came to Pima County many, many years ago, |
| 0:43.6 | 40-some years ago now. |
| 0:45.0 | And according to reporting by the Arizona Republic and Aspam, when Nanos was asked in a December 25 deposition, |
| 0:54.8 | whether he had ever been suspended, |
| 0:57.9 | he reportedly testified that he had not in the course of his career. |
| 1:02.6 | And he goes back and they're saying, |
| 1:03.8 | I thought you were just talking about here in Pima County, |
| 1:06.4 | even though the question was about his career. |
| 1:08.2 | So the Board of Supervisors is now trying to compel him to answer |
| 1:12.8 | these questions under oath and also, well, his union wants him to resign. Jen, what are your |
| 1:19.9 | thoughts on all this? Another vote of no confidence. It's not the first one that he's had. It's kind of a |
| 1:24.6 | pattern and a track record that he's got going on. But he's, he kind of does things his own way. What do you think when everybody's saying, |
| 1:31.9 | we don't, we don't believe in you. Is it time? Well, you know what? He is a guy that I've really |
| 1:39.1 | tried to give some deference to because it's difficult to be in his shoes. It's difficult to run an investigation |
| 1:45.4 | with everybody breathing down your back, looking at your every move. But he has officially |
| 1:51.8 | on my last nerve with all of the misinformation, the back and forth about the 11th, not knowing the date or at least saying |
| 2:02.7 | it correctly, that she went missing, the confusion about, or not the confusion, I should say, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

