Absolutely. The first 48 hours, we're not just watching a TV show. It is so, so important that the FBI be included in this, and they were not included. So who is working this case then?

Inexperience investigators, resulting in what you see up on the screen, critical mistakes, right?

Critical mistakes.

And some of those mistakes, when you do something wrong in an investigation like this,

you know, I quoted him numerous times, Vernon Gebrith, the NYPD lieutenant squad

commander who always said that, uh, do it right the first time because you probably will

not get a second time to do it correctly.

So if you screw it up the first time,

how are you going to correct it?

How are you going to correct that case?

So some people from all over the world here in the chat,

good evening from Denmark, Hanah Bruengren.

Welcome, welcome, welcome from Denmark.

So, yes, it's this case, again, you make mistakes that are major mistakes in the beginning.

And I know I'm probably one of the only people that harps upon the fact that the press was all over this, too.

They were all over the crime scene.

And they should have been allowed as close as they get.

I know, I think it was, Brian Enton was the one who first discovered this blood spatter.

And this blood spatter told us a lot.

It told us a lot in an evidentiary way because it told us, well, when we saw, we did a

canvas of the building or the investigators did the canvas of the home, they realized

the back doors were propped open.

...