meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Nancy Guthrie: Sheriff Nanos, Sworn Testimony, and a Career Under Legal Scrutiny

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Tony Brueski

News Commentary, True Crime, News

4.2 โ€ข 612 Ratings

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ 30 March 2026

โฑ๏ธ 13 minutes

๐Ÿงพ๏ธ Download transcript

Summary

The legal pressure surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos reached a significant threshold this week, with direct implications for the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to invoke state law compelling Nanos to provide sworn reports regarding his department โ€” with non-compliance creating a legal pathway to his removal from office.

The action follows a 241-0 no-confidence vote by the Pima County Deputies Organization, citing records from Nanos' tenure with the El Paso Police Department. According to reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM, those documents describe approximately 26 disciplinary allegations over six years โ€” including excessive force, discharge of a firearm, insubordination, illegal gambling, and threatening behavior โ€” before Nanos resigned in 1982 in lieu of termination. His deputies contend those records were never disclosed to Pima County.

Of particular legal significance: reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM indicated that in a December 2025 deposition, Nanos was asked under oath whether he had ever been suspended and reportedly testified that he had not โ€” a statement that appears inconsistent with the documented record. Pima County Supervisor Matt Heinz has described Nanos' 42-year career as potentially "based on fraud."

Against this backdrop, questions persist about critical investigative decisions in the Guthrie case: the early release of the crime scene, the routing of DNA evidence to a private Florida lab rather than through federal channels, and reported early friction with FBI evidence access. Federal prosecutors have publicly affirmed their continued involvement regardless of what occurs at the sheriff's office level.

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer provides legal and procedural analysis on the sworn testimony questions, the investigative implications of the Nanos crisis, and what a potential leadership transition means for the integrity of this case.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBIInvestigation #SwornTestimony #MissingPerson #BringNancyHome

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brewski and Robin Dree.

0:07.8

Let's continue the conversation about another aspect of this case.

0:11.8

Sheriff Nanos, his own deputies, just voted unanimously 241 to 0 to demand his resignation.

0:20.2

Records reported by the Arizona Republic show Sheriff Chris Nanos resigned from the El Paso Police Department in 1982 in lieu of termination

0:29.8

after allegedly accumulating 26 disciplinary allegations in five years, including excessive force and insubordination.

0:37.4

His deputies say none of that was disclosed when he came to Pima County many, many years ago,

0:43.6

40-some years ago now.

0:45.0

And according to reporting by the Arizona Republic and Aspam, when Nanos was asked in a December 25 deposition,

0:54.8

whether he had ever been suspended,

0:57.9

he reportedly testified that he had not in the course of his career.

1:02.6

And he goes back and they're saying,

1:03.8

I thought you were just talking about here in Pima County,

1:06.4

even though the question was about his career.

1:08.2

So the Board of Supervisors is now trying to compel him to answer

1:12.8

these questions under oath and also, well, his union wants him to resign. Jen, what are your

1:19.9

thoughts on all this? Another vote of no confidence. It's not the first one that he's had. It's kind of a

1:24.6

pattern and a track record that he's got going on. But he's, he kind of does things his own way. What do you think when everybody's saying,

1:31.9

we don't, we don't believe in you. Is it time? Well, you know what? He is a guy that I've really

1:39.1

tried to give some deference to because it's difficult to be in his shoes. It's difficult to run an investigation

1:45.4

with everybody breathing down your back, looking at your every move. But he has officially

1:51.8

on my last nerve with all of the misinformation, the back and forth about the 11th, not knowing the date or at least saying

2:02.7

it correctly, that she went missing, the confusion about, or not the confusion, I should say,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright ยฉ Tapesearch 2026.