Nancy Guthrie Case: Nanos Faces Removal Under Oath
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Tony Brueski
4.2 β’ 612 Ratings
ποΈ 14 April 2026
β±οΈ 16 minutes
ποΈ Recording | iTunes | RSS
π§ΎοΈ Download transcript
Summary
The legal architecture surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos is tightening on multiple fronts simultaneously β and the Nancy Guthrie investigation is at the center of the pressure. The Board of Supervisors has invoked Arizona Revised Statute 11-253 to compel sworn testimony, with Supervisor Matt Heinz stating publicly that the board would be within its legal rights to vacate the office and remove Nanos if he fails to comply.
Lieutenant Heather Lappin's $2 million federal lawsuit alleges a retaliatory campaign that included a punitive transfer, manufactured disciplinary actions, and a public accusation issued weeks before the 2024 election β an election Nanos won by 481 votes. The deputies' union president who organized the no-confidence vote was himself placed on administrative leave after off-duty political activity. An independent review has reportedly confirmed Nanos used department resources for political gain.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer addresses the legal calculus: the Lappin lawsuit proceeds regardless of whether Nanos holds office. The deposition questions don't disappear. The board's four inquiry areas β work history, personnel discipline, immigration enforcement, and budget overruns β are matters of public record. But what changes with a resignation is institutional access. Someone else gains control of personnel files, internal investigations, and budget records spanning four decades under one leader.
The ACLU has separately filed suit alleging deputies may have been coordinating with Border Patrol during routine traffic stops without public disclosure. Coffindaffer connects the pattern and poses the question that matters most for the Nancy Guthrie case: is the sheriff's badge functioning as the last barrier between Nanos and full legal exposure β and is Nancy's investigation paying the price?
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #PimaCountySheriff #ArizonaLaw #Tucson #SheriffRemoval #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #LegalAnalysis #JusticeForNancy
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brewski and Robin Dree. |
| 0:08.2 | Every deputy who cast a ballot on this against Nanos because the board of a supervisor said, |
| 0:15.8 | hey, let's see what's going on here. Do you all think he's a great guy or not? |
| 0:18.5 | The board of supervisors just gave him 10 business days to answer under oath or face removal because every deputy said, we don't like you. |
| 0:27.8 | You're not qualified. We have no confidence in you, which is great when every person that works |
| 0:32.5 | under you doesn't believe in you. An independent review confirmed he used his political office to go |
| 0:37.4 | after political |
| 0:38.1 | opponents, and he's still there, still running the most high-profile missing persons case in |
| 0:42.2 | America. So what exactly is he holding on to? And what falls apart for him the moment he |
| 0:49.0 | let's go? So let's drop off there. Jen, you've investigated leaders who've held on to power |
| 0:57.7 | long past the point where everyone around them wanted them gone. When a sheriff is facing a 241 to |
| 1:03.5 | zero no confidence vote from his own deputies, the board threatening removal, an independent review, |
| 1:08.4 | confirming political retaliation, a two million dollar federal |
| 1:11.7 | lawsuit um what's the calculation that makes someone say you know what i'm going to stay in this job |
| 1:17.3 | this seems lovely i i'm going to i'm going to dig in even deeper why on earth would a sane person |
| 1:24.9 | at some point not say yeah you know what nobody believes in me maybe I'm best just to go to retirement at some point and just bow out. Is it ego? Is it pride? Is it ignorance? I mean, what the hell do you think is going on here behind the scenes with Nanos? Behind the scenes, behind his head, this is what's going on. In other words, behind his face in his brain. I'm best for the job. |
| 1:45.6 | I'm completely misunderstood. |
| 1:47.9 | And everything right. |
| 1:50.0 | I made one minor mistake that really wasn't my mistake. |
| 1:53.2 | It was the six-month detective on the job releasing the crime scene. |
| 1:58.4 | I'm the man. |
| 2:00.1 | And most people believe that I just have a group of haters that are in my |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright Β© Tapesearch 2026.

