This was not viewed as random. I said that from day one, that the person that is responsible, personal persons, I think it's persons. I don't think it's a person. I think there's more than one person. And I think this person, these persons, let's put it that way, had case the location, had Bill been familiar with the location, knew who Nancy Guthrie was,

had maybe been in her home before,

had maybe worked for her or a friend or relative worked for her

and knew that there was some money to be had here.

And we could get into it and argue over the fact,

was this ever a kidnapping? Or was this a random

burglary slash home invasion? I don't believe that. I believe it was planned. I believe

that the person that entered the home that tried to cover up the rain camera.

He knew where the rain camera was.

Some things are baffling about this.

And you listen to Dr. Gary Bruchado,

who has another theory.

And a great, great scientist, a great forensic psychologist, right,

a great clinical psychologist, right, a great clinical psychologist, he believes that Nancy Guthrie was taken before out of that home and was kidnapped and murdered at some of the location.

These are his words and that the crime scene was staged to make it look like it occurred in the house.

I don't believe him either.

All you outstanding profilers, thank you so much for your theories, but I'm not buying that.

And how about the fact that there's $1.2 million in the kitty right now as a reward

to pay the kidnappers?

But that seemed to get confusing right from the very beginning, right?

Usually, if there is a legit kidnapping,

the kidnappers correspond with the family members

...