meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Breakpoint

More Historical Evidence for David and Solomon

Breakpoint

Colson Center

News, Religion & Spirituality, News Commentary, Christianity

4.82.8K Ratings

🗓️ 24 November 2023

⏱️ 1 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Israeli newspaper Haaretz recently conceded that the kingdoms of David and Solomon may have actually existed. New studies have revealed that "[r]emains of gates, defensive walls and a large administrative building at Gezer date to the early 10th century B.C.E., putting them in the right time frame to have been built by King Solomon, just as the Bible claims." 

In recent decades, skeptics suggested that these structures belonged to a later, supposedly more advanced time. Though the new studies don't prove the Bible's accuracy, the articles insist its reliability cannot be ruled out. 

In other words, the thing that pretty much everybody thought was true until just a few decades ago turns out to be actually true. The more we dig, in fact, the more archaeological evidence suggests that the facts are on the side of the Bible, not its critics. And the more we dig, the more that skepticism of the Bible is shown to be not a sign of open-minded intelligence, but of close-minded assumptions of disbelief. 

For more resources to live like a Christian in this cultural moment, visit Colsoncenter.org

 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

With a look at culture from a Christian worldview, I'm John Stone Street with the point.

0:04.5

An Israeli newspaper recently conceded that the kingdoms of David and Solomon may have actually

0:09.0

existed as the Bible reports.

0:11.0

New studies revealed that, quote, remains of gates, defensive walls, and a large

0:14.9

administrative building at Gezer, date to the early 10th century B.C.

0:18.7

putting them right in the time frame to have been built by Solomon just as the Bible claims."

0:24.0

In recent decades, skeptics have suggested that these structures belong to a later, supposedly

0:28.6

more advanced time.

0:29.6

Though these new studies don't prove the Bible's accuracy, the article insist, its reliability

0:34.5

cannot be ruled out.

0:36.1

In other words, this thing that pretty much everybody thought was true until such a few decades

0:40.0

ago, turns out to be actually true.

0:42.1

The more we dig in fact the more archaeological

0:44.2

evidence suggests that the facts are on the side of the Bible, not its critics.

0:47.8

And the more we dig, the more that skepticism of the Bible is shown to be not a sign

0:52.2

of open-minded intelligence, but of closed-minded assumptions

0:56.0

of disbelief.

0:57.0

For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street with the point.

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.