Moral certainty in a pandemic
Moral Maze
BBC
4.4 • 623 Ratings
🗓️ 29 March 2021
⏱️ 42 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
The mathematician John Allen Paulos once said, “uncertainty is the only certainty there is”. One year on from the beginning of the first lockdown, never has this felt more true. In light of this, how certain should we be in our judgments about the decisions that were taken by those in power over the last twelve months? One strongly-held view is that had the government and its advisors been more decisive, acting with greater moral clarity in the early stages of the pandemic, more lives would have been saved. While for others, hindsight is 20:20 and context is everything, and any decisions taken in the midst of extreme uncertainty must be judged accordingly. In the last year we have witnessed anything but moral clarity in our passionate debates about the balance of harms and the clashes of good versus good. Public health has been pitted against livelihoods, family life, culture and the right to protest. What lessons should we take from the pandemic about the moral value of certainty? Uncertainty, particularly if it is prolonged, is psychologically bad for us and something we instinctively want to avoid for the sake of our mental health. In leadership, we admire those who have a clarity of vision, who are not paralysed by indecision and who keep their doubts to themselves. Others, however, believe that the reason society is so polarised is because too many people are certain they are right, and that moral certitude often has the effect of pandering to one group of people while alienating another. Is it a moment to embrace complexity, humility and self-reflection? Or has the last year provided a moral clarity about all sorts of things, notably injustices, that must now push back hard against any lingering doubt? With Raghib Ali, Lord David Blunkett, Jonathan Calvert and Quassim Cassam.
Producer: Dan Tierney.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Good evening. The older I get, the less certain I am about things, which seems directly contrary to the spirit of the age. |
| 0:06.3 | Take the pandemic. The first anniversary of lockdown this week has prompted a rush to judgment, much of it condoneatory. |
| 0:13.4 | All right, there are those who say the situation was unknowable, the choices were dire, muddle and mistakes inevitable. |
| 0:19.9 | But it's certainty that holds the floor, |
| 0:22.7 | those that see it as either a catalogue of indecision and lethal incompetence, or think the |
| 0:27.4 | common good has been sacrificed in a panic over individual harm. In this, as in much of our |
| 0:32.8 | public and maybe private discourse, its moral certainty expressed as outrage that makes most of the noise. |
| 0:40.2 | What price certainty? Do we need moral clarity, they call it, to get the right things done? |
| 0:46.2 | Or should we acknowledge complexity that others might have a point, and what's right can be |
| 0:51.1 | difficult to define? That's our moral maize tonight. The panel, Melanie Phillips, social commentator on The Times, Anne McElvoy, senior editor at The Economist, Mona Siddiqui, Professor of Islamic and Inter-Religious Studies at the University of Edinburgh, and the comedian, Andrew Doyle. Melanie, Melanie Phillips, you're not known for self-doubt. Do you have a sense of certainty about the pandemic? |
| 1:15.5 | Well, it's a terrible mistake to confuse moral clarity with an absence of doubt. |
| 1:20.9 | Many, such as myself, wrestle all the time with complexities both moral and practical. |
| 1:23.5 | But ultimately, I think it's wrong to duck a moral position, |
| 1:27.3 | while all the time keeping an open mind to the possibility you may be wrong. |
| 1:28.8 | Andrew, Andrew Dole? |
| 1:35.2 | I think one of the most chilling aspects of today's political tribalism that we see is the sheer certainty. |
| 1:40.4 | And whenever I see these people on Twitter just going out of control and accusing people of all sorts of horrible things, |
| 1:42.5 | you can tell they've never doubted themselves. |
| 1:49.5 | They've never thought to themselves, I could be wrong. And if that comes from a political leader, then if a political leader says he's got all the answers, I don't trust him. |
| 2:02.2 | Mona. Mano Siddiqui. I think you're right, Michael, that as you get older, you realize how complex things are. But I think we can show moral clarity and certainty on things, on anything which helps alleviate suffering for anyone. When it comes to leaders, though, I think it's important that we don't confuse |
| 2:07.3 | humility and hubris. And I'm a McKelvoy. There's a great poem by Bertolt Brecht called in |
| 2:13.1 | praise of doubt, which lays out the arguments for not being so certain about the world. But there are |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

