meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Boom! Lawyered

Mootness Might Save Civil Rights Testing

Boom! Lawyered

Rewire News Group

Immigration, News, History, Jeff Sessions, Reproductive, Racial, Trials, Law, Lgbtq, Supreme Court, Scotus, Government, Politics, Justice, Discrimination

4.8616 Ratings

🗓️ 20 October 2023

⏱️ 31 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Acheson Hotels v. Laufer has the potential upend the Americans with Disabilities Act—but it probably won't.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, fellow law nerds. Welcome to another episode of Boom Lawyred, a Rewire News Group podcast hosted by the legal journalism team that stands Black Women Lawyers.

0:21.6

I'm ReWire News Group, editor at large, and Black Women Lawyer, Imani Gandhi.

0:26.2

And I'm Jess Piclo, ReWire News Group's executive editor.

0:30.4

Rewire News Group is the one and only home for expert repro journalism that inspires you to

0:35.3

stand Black Women Lawyers.

0:37.3

And the BoomLewed podcast is part of that mission. So stand black women lawyers.

0:41.0

And the boom lawyer podcast is part of that mission.

0:44.4

So a big thanks to our subscribers and a welcome to our new listeners.

0:48.9

So the theme for this season is who gets to be a person.

0:52.7

We talked about that with respect to trans people last week. And this week, we're going to talk about people

0:54.7

with disabilities, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and how the Supreme Court that could,

1:00.2

but probably won't, but maybe, but could still interfere with the ability of people to become

1:06.5

civil rights testers there. Okay. So first off, we should probably tell our listeners what a civil

1:12.1

rights tester is because you know, because you used to do this kind of stuff back when you worked

1:16.5

in housing discrimination law, right? Right. We talked about it a little bit in our preview episode of

1:21.6

the Supreme Court term and for this case. So when I worked as a lawyer in Minnesota, we would send

1:26.8

testers out to see if landlords

1:28.4

were turning away families under Section 8 housing. That was public housing assistance for folks

1:33.4

in the state. And in Minnesota, family status is a protected status under state law. You can't

1:38.6

discriminate against someone for having kids. And these testers were literally people who would just go out

1:43.6

and like, you know,

1:44.9

try to rent an apartment and say they had a family and see if the landlord would give them a

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Rewire News Group, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Rewire News Group and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.