Monopoly and Muckraking
TALKING POLITICS
Catherine Carr
4.7 • 2.5K Ratings
🗓️ 29 December 2019
⏱️ 32 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Gary Gerstle talks about the journalist who brought down a business empire, when Ida Tarbell went after the power of John D Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Corporation at the start of the twentieth century. Could anyone do the same to Facebook or Amazon today?
Talking Points:
America’s foundational myth is about rebelling against monopolies: a monopoly of power in the hands of the King.
- How does an anti-monopolistic society get dominated by monopolies?
- Industrialization and the free economic environment after the Civil War created different conditions.
- The Supreme Court interpreted the 14th amendment to mean that corporations are individuals and therefore protected by the Bill of Rights.
Resistance to monopolies reached a peak during the first Gilded Age.
- Some of the resistance was political, but some of it was journalistic.
- Journalists known as ‘muckrakers’ sought to expose the practices that produced extraordinary power.
- The reports of journalist Ida Tarbell ultimately led to the breakup of Standard Oil of Ohio.
- Journalism set the tone for the progressive reform movement.
The election of 1912 was about what to do about the trusts/monopolies.
- Debs wanted to nationalize them; Wilson wanted to break them up; Roosvevelt said regulate them; only Taft carried take a stand.
- Roosevelt’s approach ultimately carried the day.
What can the past tell us about today?
- Warren is carrying forward the breakup agenda.
- Previous anti-monopoly movements took a long time; don’t expect much too quickly.
- But the sentiments haven’t gone away. And the forces that Warren and Sanders have unleashed will continue to percolate.
Mentioned in this Episode:
Further Learning:
- More on Ida Tarbell
- A Talking Politics Guide to … the Gilded Age
- More on Elizabeth Warren’s plan to break up big tech
And as ever, recommended reading curated by our friends at the LRB can be found here: lrb.co.uk/talking
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, my name is David Ronserman and this is Talking Politics. This is the third episode |
| 0:07.6 | in our American History series and today Gary Gerstle is going to tell us the story of |
| 0:12.2 | Ida Talbell, the woman who brought down standard oil. Could the same thing happen today? |
| 0:18.4 | In the age of Cambridge Analytica and Facebook. |
| 0:25.0 | Talking Politics is brought to you in partnership with the London Review of Books. This Christmas, |
| 0:30.1 | it's thought that counts. Give everyone you know a subscription to the LRB for just 1999 |
| 0:37.0 | and they'll throw in a free 2020 calendar featuring some of the best of their fantastic cover art. |
| 0:43.4 | Find this special festive offer at lrb.me-forwardslash-Christmas. |
| 0:53.4 | Today's episode is about monopoly and muck-raking. Let's start with monopoly. |
| 0:58.9 | So it has a particular cache I think in American political and public life at the end of the 19th |
| 1:04.7 | century which is when we're coming to but what's the origin story here? What did monopoly mean as an |
| 1:10.0 | idea as a term at this point? monopoly in America comes straight out of the American revolution |
| 1:18.2 | and the belief that George the third British Crown had taken all power onto itself and was |
| 1:25.2 | strangling the liberties of the people. And so America's foundation story, its origin story, |
| 1:32.0 | is about not just rebelling against the Crown and George the third but it's rebelling against |
| 1:37.4 | the principle of monopoly. It was originally conceived of as political monopoly of one man, |
| 1:44.5 | one institution having control over all political institutions and not allowing other voices or |
| 1:50.9 | serious representation. There was an economic dimension to it because part of the power of the |
| 1:57.0 | Crown was to issue charters, to crown favorites, to establish colonies, to trade, to transport, |
| 2:06.2 | to mine. And this practice of issuing monopolies is actually transferred initially into the new |
| 2:12.6 | American nation. So there is an economic dimension to it but it's regarded with a great deal of |
| 2:18.6 | skepticism and anger because economic monopoly like political monopoly is going to strangle |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catherine Carr, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Catherine Carr and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

