meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Money Talks from The Economist

Money talks: Fudge-ocracy

Money Talks from The Economist

The Economist

News, Business, Economy, Finance & Economics, Business News

4.41.2K Ratings

🗓️ 22 March 2016

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This week: What a study about promotions in China might say about the country's GDP data, and stormy waters ahead for asset managers

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

They're not authors, but they help you shape your financial story.

0:04.0

They're not an airline, but they connect global businesses across nearly 160 local markets.

0:10.0

They're not interpreters that they listen to and understand their client's needs.

0:14.8

With global expertise and over two centuries of experience, Citi provides tools, insights and

0:20.8

guidance that helps clients thrive.

0:23.0

They're not just any bank.

0:25.0

They are city.

0:27.0

Learn more at city.com slash we are city.

0:30.0

The Economist.

0:34.0

From The Economist in London, this is Money Talks, a weekly programme about news in the worlds of business, finance and economics.

0:46.0

I'm Edward McBride, the finance editor.

0:49.0

Every time China announces new growth figures, sceptics question the accuracy of the data. On this week's show,

0:54.6

I'll be discussing a new study that showed some light on Chinese statistics with John O'Sullivan,

0:59.3

our economics editor. We'll also be looking at the asset management industry, which is facing a leaner future.

1:06.4

With me to talk about that is Philip Kogan, our Buttonwood columnist.

1:10.3

Let's start with you, John.

1:11.5

The paper I mentioned doesn't actually look at growth statistics, right?

1:15.0

It looks at demographic statistics to try and work out how accurate Chinese government data is.

1:20.0

So the study is actually of about a thousand local officials, a study by economists at

1:26.0

Duke University and the University of Colorado, and they find that those officials who succeeded

1:30.5

at checking local population growth, by which we mean imposing the

1:34.4

one child policy successfully, had a better chance of getting promoted than those that didn't.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Economist, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Economist and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.