Monday, April 24, 2023
The Briefing with Albert Mohler
The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
4.8 • 8.4K Ratings
🗓️ 24 April 2023
⏱️ 25 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Part I (00:13 - 09:32)
The Abortion Fight Thrown Back to Lower Courts: SCOTUS Issues Order in Fight Over Mail-in Abortion Pill
Part II (09:32 - 15:05)
A Human Pesticide or Method of Liberation?: The Worldview Divide Over Mifepristone—and Abortion by Any Means
Part III (15:05 - 22:12)
Who are the Good Guys in Sudan?: The Country’s Civil War Sheds Light on the Complexity of Its Current Conflict
Part IV (22:12 - 25:16)
A Rapid, Unscheduled Disassembly: Space X’s Successful, Albeit Short-Lived, Mission This Weekend
Sign up to receive The Briefing in your inbox every weekday morning.
Follow Dr. Mohler:
Twitter | Instagram | Facebook | YouTube
For more information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to sbts.edu.
For more information on Boyce College, just go to BoyceCollege.com.
To write Dr. Mohler or submit a question for The Mailbox, go here.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | It's Monday, April 24, 2023. |
| 0:07.8 | I'm Albert Moller, and this is The Briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a |
| 0:12.2 | Christian-world view. |
| 0:14.0 | The Supreme Court of the United States handed down an order on Friday, much expected, |
| 0:18.2 | much anticipated. |
| 0:19.8 | The actual substance of the order means that the abortion pill known as Mifopristone will |
| 0:24.2 | continue to be distributed according to current FDA procedures. |
| 0:29.7 | But this does not mean that the case is over. |
| 0:31.7 | It does not mean that the Supreme Court will not eventually have to rule directly on the |
| 0:35.8 | merits of this case. |
| 0:37.7 | It does mean that even with an expedited process, the Supreme Court has sent the issue back |
| 0:42.7 | to lower courts. |
| 0:43.8 | Let's just remind ourselves of how we got here. |
| 0:46.3 | First of all, a suit was filed in a Texas Federal Court, a district court alleging that |
| 0:51.9 | the Food and Drug Administration, in the year 2000, that's at least the year in which |
| 0:55.9 | the policy was handed down, approved the use of the drug Mifopristone and its prescription |
| 1:01.8 | by doctors as one of two major abortion pills that would lead to medical abortion in the |
| 1:07.4 | United States. |
| 1:08.6 | The case that was made by those who were bringing the case is that the FDA violated its own |
| 1:13.6 | procedures and thus violated the law in this sense in pushing through the authorization |
| 1:19.9 | for Mifopristone. |
| 1:21.7 | And the case drew a great deal of national attention from the beginning. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

