The Supreme Court is considering whether police can access cell phone data that, you know,

tells them where you are or tells police where you are. And that will shape how millions of

Americans are tracked. So the ruling is expected, you know, sometime in the future, maybe this summer.

So after witness interviews and security footage, they produced no leads in a 2019

Virginia bank robbery. Officials obtained a warrant requiring Google to share data on devices

within a 150 meter radius.

Well, I guess, you know, we have to know what 150 meters are of a bank that 30 minutes

before and after a crime had occurred.

That led to this guy, O'Kalachetri, who is, I think that's how you pronounce his name,

O-K-E-L-L-O-C-H-A-T-R-I-E.

He's serving a 12-year sentence in prison.

His lawyers argue the warrant was overly broad, violating Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches.

The government, however, says,

hey, anyone who voluntarily shares their location with tech companies has no expectation of privacy.

Oh, okay. And about four in five U.S. adults report enabling location sharing on their devices,

which companies like Google, Apple,

and Uber use to give the personalized search results, weather updates, and other location-based services. Yeah, we just want to know. We just want to know the information. We want to know

how to get places, and we want Uber to pick us up where we're at. I know we want our insurance company when we call for a tow or a pickup or roadside service. We want them to know where we're at. So we're enable our location sharing device on our phone. So just remember that when you go to rob a bank. When you go to rob a bank,

make sure all your location devices, your location sharing devices are turned in the off mode.

Welcome. Because you know the Supreme Court is going to, I find it very difficult to believe that they're going to side on a bank robber.

I know.

I know.

...