And the There's a difference between being an overrated football player and being an overrated fantasy asset.

No better example than Derek Henry.

Derek Henry is a grossly overrated fantasy asset,

but I would argue is an underrated football player.

In those instances are fascinating to me.

I love Derek Henry in Dynasty because DeMarco Murray has no guarantees for 2018 to

2019. Zero guaranteed money. I mean he's gone. We know

DeMarco Murray is gone after the season. It's going to be the Derek Henry show.

But in the meantime, Derek Henry's a backup running back. He has no role and he's behind a durable running back. I know DeMarco Murray is perceived as an injury prone in quotes running back he's not

de Marco Murray's missed a couple games in the last three years that I can remember and when he does get hurt he typically

plays hurt less efficiently but still at an RB1 level. I don't understand where Derek

Henry fits in. I don't know why he's being drafted in the first 10 rounds of

fantasy drafts. I don't get it. But on the other end of the spectrum, I also don't understand this notion that we don't know whether or not Derek Henry is good. Why you got to go there? Why are you going to say that? This is just wrong. But that was Mike Clay's analysis.

A, Derek Henry has no role.

Agree, agree with that.

I agree.

And then he drives his truck right into the ditch

by saying, we're not even sure Derek Henry is good he could pull a

Booker this year the fuck out of here what kind of analysis is that how can

someone say that? Much less a preeminent figure in

fantasy football. I mean how? We know why Devante Booker underperformed last year. The Denver Broncos offensive line

posted a 77.9 run blocking efficiency grade on player profiler.com 26th in the

...