The wizard writes in, you admit coaches can determine running back pass volume, then

insist that Adrian Peterson can't catch 60 passes. Were you dropped as a child?

Again, again, again.

Again. You don't need the end, the jab at the end, under my rib cage, where you dropped as a child,

unnecessary, unnecessary, ask the question, are you sure? Basically what you're asking is, are you sure Adrian Peterson can't catch 60 passes?

Can you go look at your analysis again and get back to us and see if you can catch 60 passes please thank you

yeah great I will sure where you dropped as a child what's wrong with you people

you don't need to do that to me you don don't need to be cruel. That's not funny.

It's just cruel.

Mean-spirited. I'm here to help you.

And you're here, you want to tear me down. I'm here to help. Thanks. Okay. I shouldn't even respond to this buzzard, but I will because I think a lot of people are thinking the same thing. so I'll respond.

North Turner's running backs historically

only caught a lot of passes when they were great route runners,

when they were great receivers in and of themselves,

when you could actually play, if it was a player you could actually play in the slot and he would be successful.

Someone like Lydani and Tomlinson.

Someone like Danny Woodhead could play in the slot and produce.

Not Willis McGahy. Not Willis McGeehi, not Stephen Davis, and not Adrian Peterson. Those guys,

McGee, Davis, Peterson, these are not great route runners.

Those running backs only excel at catching design screens,

which is like a delayed hand-off or dump-offs and checkdowns.

That's it.

...