And soo, The buzzards are learning, the buzzards are adapting.

The buzzards are adapting. And He writes, what do you think of my wide receiver running back prediction paradox theory?

It's easier to predict wide receivers than running backs for season long production, and

yet it's more difficult to predict wide receiver

production on a per week basis week to week. Well that's absolutely correct.

At Sands Bacon nailed it.

Apparently if you don't eat pig products, you get smarter.

Oh, look at him. He don't eat pork. Well, this guy is not eating pork and he understands fantasy football better than 99.99999999999999999% percent of fantasy gamers.

This strikes to the heart of the key theoretical

foundation for building redraft rosters and DFS rosters. He's distilled

it down to the crux of it all. It's very difficult to predict full season running back

performances year to year. Why? Because the running back position has a higher bust rate and a higher injury rate.

From one season to the next, you have less certainty about the production that you're going to receive from any given running back compared to any given wide receiver.

That notion is what the concept of anti-fragility and

zero R.B is built on. And the reverse is true when you're building your weekly DFS lineups. The position on the depth chart and the

matchup, those are the key predictors of running back production on a per week basis.

That's why this concept of the free square running back is much more prevalent

than the free square wide receiver. You have a new running back that's been elevated to the

primary back role for his team who will be facing a soft run defense that's a free square

when a wide receiver is elevated up the depth chart like we'll see this week with j. j.

Nelssohn being elevated to the starting lineup after the release of Michael Floyd,

the depth chart elevation and the corresponding matchup does not necessarily translate into additional

...