Hmm... Dom and dogs.

I'm going to get you.

And when this comes out for free, people will be confused at that they're gonna be like why did

Alex say that I was driving and I died a man in the backseat and he got me now I am going to get you

welcome to the minisone everybody uh I don't just have something cool but let me just do I want to do mine first because it's pretty quick. It's not like something to be diving into. Who knows what Alex has? And I don't know what Alex. Oh, it's good. On my screen, Alex's image is totally frozen with his mouth open. Oh, it just fixed itself. Okay, we're back. What if I just do that instead as like just like, that's just how I do it?

I want to talk about really quickly the Wall Street Journal two-part article about UAPs that they released a couple weeks, like last week of the week before. Uh, yeah. Each week apart. And it's fascinating because they sucked. Um, it's good. It's good. It's good because people are reading about the shit that don't ever see it.

It's not good because they don't mention their sources. It's where they get these

information and stuff. However, what I found fascinating was that John Greenwald, the Black

Volk guy, after this article dropped and he shit all over it as well, what he released was

interesting because what we learned is. What he released was interesting because

what we learn is that what he thought was just one author writing on this article has been in

contact with him since January of this year. And since then, has been in hours and hours and

hours of communication with him about getting certain documents that he got for the article

and whatnot. And then as the article came out, he says it's insane because they ignored all of it. They didn't use any of it. And so he goes on, I'm going to read a little bit of his tweet. And then he links every single source they asked for that he got for them and that they did not use in the article because the two piece article

basically makes shits on it makes fun of it and says it's all disinformation essentially

with that that's basically the extent of the article pieces uh so he goes um this was how the

author and what he was under the impression that there was only one described the recent wall street

journal two part UAP piece.

As promised, I waited until part two came out to fully judge, but the final piece is clearly not what was pitched. Part one was largely unsourced with no real evidence presented, while

part two seemed to not be a part two at all, but dove into mostly information that's already

been published before, with the exception of one thing that did interest me,

but I'll get to that in a different day because I'm not entirely convinced there's truth to it.

...