Right, that's it. Come on, lights out. You've got a test tomorrow. Just two minutes. I'm about to reach the next level. It's going off now. Yeah, whatever. Let's see. Where's the app? Oh, here it is. What? How? Oh, no, you're out. Better look next time. Mom! It's game over for late nights on school nights. EE Wi-Fi controls help you get them off the Wi-Fi and into bed.

More parents are choosing EE broadband, the UK's fastest growing broadband provider.

To verify I see EE.com.uk.

We all spend much of our lives arguing with bots on social media,

so I decided to argue with a real overt bot, which is chat GPT, I want to convince

chat GPT that God exists.

ChatGPT, I want you to tell me the odds of God's existence based on the arguments I'm making.

What are they right now before I say anything? ChatGPT says 50%.

Shall we begin?

Okay. Bertrand Russell, one of the greatest logicians of the 20th century, and an avowid atheist

famously tried to disprove the ontological argument for God.

The ontological argument was formulated by Saint Anselm, and later reformulated by Leibniz, Goetl, and recently Alvin Plantinga, people who differed

in some theological, philosophical beliefs, but who none the less uniformly affirmed the argument. So persuasive was the argument that even

Russell was impelled to conclude that the ontological argument is sound.

52%. Well, I've only went up 2%.

Okay, we've got to break out the big guns.

We're going to St. Thomas Aquinas.

It is clear that things change in the cosmos.

But if everything is... I'll do like a short version of the unmoved mover, which Aquinas thought

was the most persuasive one, if everything is changing, there must be something that is

constant and unchanging, causing the change. This has been called the unmoved mover.

This thing we all understand to be God. St.inas, I'll appeal to a little authority here.

...