Pentagon has officially bought and burned 9,500 copies of Lieutenant Colonel Anthony Schaefer's memoir called Operation Darkheart.

His book was about going undercover in Afghanistan, and it basically points out a pre-9-11 data mining project called Abel Danger, which is extremely expository.

So we're just wondering, why isn't this a bigger story all across mainstream media right now

that the Pentagon has bought and burned almost 10,000 copies of a book?

Why isn't this a bigger story?

And why is only Fox News seem to be the only media organization

that's covering this right now? It's very, very suspicious. Yeah, it's like the media is,

you know, if you go, if you search for it on Google News, you can find about 100 articles about it,

but most of them are just kind of repeating the same information. And none of them are really

connecting the dots.

I mean, they're very easy to connect. It's like, why is this story important? Why would the Pentagon

want to burn, you know, almost 10,000 copies of someone's book? It's because of the passage in the book

about able danger. And Colonel Schaefer, you know, he's admitted that that's the reason why. The Pentagon

destroyed them. In that section of his book, he basically clearly lays out that they had a

picture of Muhammad Atta linked to all a lot of these other hijackers and other, you know,

supposedly Al-Qaeda members. They had a chart showing that Muhammad Atta was linked to all these

other people about a year before 9-11.

What that does is it puts a huge chink in the armor of the Pentagon's 9-11 official narrative that, you know, we didn't know who these people were.

It was a surprise attack. There were sleeper cells and all this stuff.

Yeah, it seems like they were really rigorously cataloged and mapped out in

this project. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, they hired a company to make a chart for them. They had,

I think, something like over 50 terabytes of data on this investigation. It was a huge

...